Skip to content

· Private foundation

Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$710k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$606kEducation$465kHuman Services$415kInternational$305kReligion$285kHousing & Shelter$130kFood & Nutrition$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $571k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREAM CATCHERS$191,000
AMER FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOC JERUSALEM$100,000
ST FRANCIS OUTREACH TRUST$80,000
Gr Washington Edu TV Assn NEWS HOUR$50,000
LOVE QUILT PROJECT$50,000
EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELPT$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WARM HEART INTL$25,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL OF NOVA$25,000
ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
ST PETER'S DOM REP$24,000
MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY$15,000
ARMSTRONG LEADERSHIP RICHMOND HILL$15,000
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $594k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELPT: $50k → 17%Children in Crisis: $40k → 8%American Friends of the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem: $150k → 9%Episcopal Relief & Development: $50k → 17%CHILDEN IN CRISIS INC: $24k → 8%EPICOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT IN: $50k → 17%Goodwin House Foundation: $75k → 6%Goodwin House Foundation: $50k → 6%Goodwin House Foundation: $35k → 6%GOODWIN LIVING FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%GOODWIN LIVING FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$953k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$689k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $264k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +213%
  • MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +8%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NOVA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +298%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +142%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOCESE
    one grant, 2024 · $110k
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Shepherd Episcopal School

The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…

Education
2
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
5
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
6
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
7
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
8
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
9
International Social Service United States of America Branch Inc

Iss-usa mobilizes a domestic and international network of social work, legal, and other professionals to connect children, adults and families separated by borders with the services and support they need.

Human Services
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
Community Systems Support and Management Services Inc

Helping persons with disabilities to find happiness in their own homes, in their personal relationships, and as contributing members of their community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwin House Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DREAM CATCHERS: $308,700 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSST FRANCIS OUTREACH TRUST: $230,000 · OtherST FRANCIS OUTREACH TRUSTST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $130,000 · OtherST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCHAMERICAN FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOCESE: $110,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOCESEAMER FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOC JERUSALEM: $100,000 · OtherAMER FRIENDS EPISCOPAL DIOC JERUSALEMRed Cross National Capital Region: $100,000 · OtherRed Cross National Capital RegionARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC: $87,000 · OtherARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NOVA INC: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherVIRGINIA PUBLIC MEDIA PUBLIC TV ST: $50,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of NOVA: $50,000 · OtherGr Washington Edu TV Assn NEWS HOUR: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $151,000 · Other+5 moreGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $230,000 · Human ServicesGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EP…EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $150,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVEL…CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $64,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN CRISIS INCThe Love Quilt Project Inc: $110,000 · InternationalWARM HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 · InternationalMARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $60,000 · EducationFeeding America: $100,000 · Food & NutritionVALOR SERVICE DOGS INC: $40,000 · AnimalsRICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED: $15,000 · Religion
Other$1,481,700Human Services$594,000International$155,000Education$150,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Animals$40,000Religion$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $308,700 over 4y, 23% of budgetGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $150,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Love Quilt Project Inc: $110,000 over 3y, 67% of budgetFeeding America: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC: $87,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NOVA INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC: $64,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWARM HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetVALOR SERVICE DOGS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DREAM CATCHERS ↗
  • Who funds GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds The Love Quilt Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WARM HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VALOR SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia IncVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Campbell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Campbell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph