Skip to content
Campbell Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$18kEnvironment$16kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$12kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kInternational$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA FOR CHILDREN$3,000
YOUTH CARE$1,000
CENTRAL OREGON TRAIL ALLIANCE$1,000
YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE$1,000
GLOBAL ROOTS$1,000
GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $2k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%JOIN: $2k → 12%JOIN: $2k → 12%YOUTH CARE: $500 → 9%JOIN: $1k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $1k → 9%JOIN: $1k → 12%YOUTH CARE: $500 → 9%JOIN: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 9 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$60k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+7%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASA FOR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +27%
  • GV
    GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +234%
  • Y
    YOUTHCARE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -8%
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
2
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
3
Young Women's Christian Association of Bellingham

YWCA Bellingham is part of a national network of programs with the shared mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, and freedom for all.

Human Services
4
Solid Ground Washington

At Solid Ground, we work passionately to end poverty and build a more equitable community. Our services support people experiencing poverty by helping them achieve stability and expand their skills to realize their dreams. And that's just…

Housing & Shelter
5
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
6
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
7
Washington Bikes

Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.

Recreation & Sports
8
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
9
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
10
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
11
Real Escape From the Sex Trade

We exist to provide pathways to freedom, safety, and hope for victims of sex trafficking and people involved in the sex trade.

Crime & Legal
12
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lide Haiti. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsCASA FOR CHILDREN INCGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $14,500 · EnvironmentGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUSTPark County Environmental Council: $1,000 · EnvironmentPark County Environmental …Central Oregon Trail Alliance: $1,000 · EnvironmentCentral Oregon Trail Allia…JOIN: $6,500 · Human ServicesJOINYOUTHCARE: $5,500 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARETHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN…NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIESEverstrong Prevention: $1,000 · Human ServicesEverstrong PreventionSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $7,000 · OtherSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODMEREDITH METHEWS EAST MADISON YMCA: $2,000 · OtherMEREDITH METHEWS EAST M…OREGON FOOD BANK: $1,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIE…LIDE HAITI: $1,000 · OtherLIDE HAITIBike Works Seattle: $500 · OtherCOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterGLOBAL ROOTS: $1,000 · International
Civil Rights$18,000Environment$16,500Human Services$16,000Other$14,500Youth Development$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $14,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJOIN: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPark County Environmental Council: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Oregon Trail Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ROOTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIDE HAITI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEverstrong Prevention: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBike Works Seattle: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationJune & Julian Foss Fo…United Way of King Co…M J Murdock Charitabl…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…
Seattle FoundationWA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · June & Julian Foss Foundation · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Join: 4% of income from government
  • Casa for Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Trail Alliance: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Campbell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Campbell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home