Skip to content
Cammarata Family Foundation Ua 5/29/97 at a glance

· Private foundation

Cammarata Family Foundation Ua 5/29/97

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$595k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.3MHuman Services$576kEducation$144kEnvironment$120kHousing & Shelter$85kYouth Development$25kCrime & Legal$10kReligion$7k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$595,004
LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC$501,056
JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR BENSONHURST$50,000
BOCA RAATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL$50,000
EMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
EMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PALM BEACH$25,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL$25,000
BUILDING MINDS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$15,000
DANA- FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$9,518
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC$2,752
BOCA RATON POLICE FUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HANDS ON TZEDAKAH: $26k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 13 repeat orgs$518k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$9.1M
$462k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+40%

Still filing today

77%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +162%
  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2.5M · revenue +45%
  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BI
    BETH ISREAL LAHEY HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $185k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BENSONHU
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • ND
    NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beth Israel Lahey Health Inc

Beth israel lahey health inc.'s mission is to support its affiliates and their healthcare missions, to improve the health of patients, their families and the communities served. as a network its purpose is to create healthier communities…

Health
2
Medical Care of Boston Management Corp

Medical care of boston management corp d/b/a beth israel lahey health primary care a/k/a affiliated physicians group (apg) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with beth israel lahey health (bilh) and its hospitals…

Health
3
Beth Israel Lahey Health Primary Care

Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community-based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey…

—
4
Beth Israel Lahey Health Specialty Care F/K/a Northeast Medical Practice

Beth israel lahey health specialty care f/k/a northeast medical practice (bilhsc fka nmp) primary mission is to provide high-quality medical care to the patients of the lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey clinic, and lahey clinic peabody and…

Health
5
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
6
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc or hospital) has four facilities, beverly hospital,…

Health
7
Northeast Behavioral Health Corporation

The mission of northeast behavioral health corporation d/b/a beth israel lahey health behavioral services' (bilhbs) is to provide personal, compassionate, state-of-the-art, integrated behavioral healthcare that makes a difference in the…

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Joslin Clinic Inc

The primary mission of joslin diabetes center (jdc) and joslin clinic (jc) is to provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to engage in research focused on advancing…

Health
10
Northeast Professional Registry of Nurses

Northeast professional registry of nurses, d/b/a beth israel lahey health continuing care and beth israel lahey health at home (nprn or bilh at home), offers support to patients following a hospital stay, during recovery, or to assist with…

Health
11
Beth Israel Lahey Health Pharmacy Inc

The purpose of the beth israel lahey health pharmacy (pharmacy) is to support patients and employees across the network of its sole member, beth israel lahey health ("bilh"). beth israel lahey health (bilh) is an integrated health care…

Health
12
New England Baptist Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of nebh patients. nebh strives to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emerson Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,701,788 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncLAHEY CLINIC INC: $2,500,000 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC INCLAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,808,231 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $271,000 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CTR BENSONHURST: $450,000 · OtherJEWISH COM…BETH ISREAL LAHEY HEALTH: $184,980 · OtherBETH ISREA…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BENSONHU: $100,000 · OtherJEWISH COM…EMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherEMERSON HE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PALM BEACH: $50,000 · OtherBOYS & GIR…+7 more: $78,000 · Other+7 moreCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION: $5,000 · EducationTHE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $120,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $50,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Community ImprovementBOCA RATON POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Health$8,281,019Other$912,980Education$127,500Arts & Culture$120,000Housing & Shelter$85,000Human Services$75,500Community Improvement$30,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,701,788 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC INC: $2,500,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,808,231 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $167,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $120,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEMERSON HOSPITAL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $25,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMERSON HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA RATON POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncNeil & Anna Rasmussen…The Bank of America C…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Boston Foundation IncMA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Neil & Anna Rasmussen Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cammarata Family Foundation Ua 5/29/97 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cammarata Family Foundation Ua 5/29/97. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Veterans Legal Services Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Walden Woods Project: 6% of income from government
  • Emerson Hospital: 3% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cammarata Family Foundation Ua 5/29/97’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home