Skip to content

· Private foundation

Camara-Press Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.2MHousing & Shelter$590kYouth Development$535kFood & Nutrition$520kHuman Services$489kAnimals$455kEducation$380kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $713k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$40,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Constellation Fund$275,000
Minnesota Wrestling Club$163,000
Minneapolis Recreation Development$100,000
Groveland Food Shelf$75,000
Second Harvest Heartland$75,000
Police Chaplin's Ministry of Chicago$75,000
Union Gospel Mission Twin Cities$75,000
Spark Academy of Advanced Technologies$50,000
Childrens Minnesota Foundation$50,000
JDRF-Minneapolis St Paul$50,000
Saint Louis School$40,000
Odyssey Project$40,000
Animal Humane Society$40,000
Jeremiah Program$35,000
Hospitality House Youth Development$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Union Gospel Mission Twin Cities: $40k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $40k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $40k → 14%ANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%ANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%ANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Andrea Miller Foundation: $10k → 11%Andrea Miller Foundation: $10k → 11%Andrea Miller Foundation: $10k → 11%Union Gospel Mission Twin Cities: $75k → 11%Union Gospel Mission Twin Cities: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
RI
CA
CO
AZ
DC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 27 repeat orgs$743k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$6.5M
$723k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-15%

Still filing today

41%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Constellation Fund
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    8× · 2017–2025 · $289k · revenue +161%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $265k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • UO
    UN OF MINN FOUNDATION FOR GOPHER WRESTLING FACILITY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • MR
    MINNEAPOLIS RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL
    one grant, 2018 · $85k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Agate Housing & Services Inc

To end homelessness and relieve hunger through action and advocacy.

Religion
2
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
3
The Humanity Alliance

The Humanity Alliance is a Minnesota-based 501(c)(3) non-profit that aspires to create long-lasting community value. Our initial focus is on providing improved access to nutrition for those who are food insecure... restoring love and…

Community Improvement
4
Anna Marie's Alliance

Provide education, intervention and advocacy to those affected by relationship abuse with a holistic approach and anti-oppression focus.

Human Services
5
Union Gospel Mission Inc

The union gospel mission duluth is a welcoming christian nonprofit organization that serves as a refuge and is committed to nourishing peoples physical, spiritual, and social needs. through our on-site meal program, community housing…

—
6
Ruff Start Rescue Inc

Ruff start rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of animals in need. we improve animal welfare in communities through adoption, education, and providing resources for people and pets.

Animals
7
Feeding Furry Friends

Our mission is to bring in donated pet food and pet supplies and hand them out to other nonprofits including: animal rescues, animal sanctuaries, other animal efforts, and food shelves. We take in donations from all over the USA and unload…

Animals
8
Alexandra House Inc

Alexandra house's mission is to empower victims of domestic and sexual violence, and inspire social change through education, support and advocacy.

Human Services
9
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
10
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
11
Community Emergency Service Inc

Community emergency service (ces) is one of the largest food distribution nonprofits serving one of the poorest communities in the twin cities. our mission is to turn hunger into hope through three principal programs: (i) food market, (ii)…

Human Services
12
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospitality House Youth Development; the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Minnesota Wrestling Club: $813,000 · OtherMinnesota Wrestling ClubPolice Chaplin's Ministry of Chicago: $300,000 · OtherPolice Chaplin's Ministry of ChicagoJDRF-MINNEAPOLIS ST PAUL: $285,000 · OtherJDRF-MINNEAPOLIS ST PAULODYSSEY PROJECT: $245,000 · OtherODYSSEY PROJECTPOLICE CHAPLIANS MINISTRY FATHER BRANDT: $225,000 · OtherPOLICE CHAPLIANS MINISTRY FATHER BRANDTJUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATIONSAINT LOUIS SCHOOL: $220,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS SCHOOLChildrens Minnesota Foundation: $200,000 · OtherUN OF MINN FOUNDATION FOR GOPHER WRESTLING FACILITY FUND: $200,000 · Other+21 more: $1,043,050 · Other+21 moreThe Constellation Fund: $1,125,000 · PhilanthropyThe Constellation…Minneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another: $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentMinneapolis …HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOSPITALITY …SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $265,000 · Food & NutritionGROVELAND EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF INC: $255,000 · Food & NutritionAnimal Humane Society: $255,000 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $120,000 · Animals+2 more: $20,000 · AnimalsUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC: $245,000 · Human ServicesANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION: $122,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $289,000 · Housing & ShelterMR MO PROJECT SENIOR DOG RESCUE: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,756,050Philanthropy$1,125,000Youth Development$785,000Food & Nutrition$520,000Animals$395,000Human Services$367,000Housing & Shelter$289,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Constellation Fund: $1,125,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetMinneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another: $700,000 over 7y, 57% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $289,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $265,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGROVELAND EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF INC: $255,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $255,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC: $245,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION: $122,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSPARK ACADEMY OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES: $110,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $85,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetVICTORY TRAIN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMR MO PROJECT SENIOR DOG RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Constellation Fund ↗
  • Who funds Minneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds GROVELAND EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDREA MILLER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARK ACADEMY OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MR MO PROJECT SENIOR DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camara-Press Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camara-Press Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Camara-Press Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Camara-Press Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Camara-Press’ filings →

    More from the funding graph