Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Calm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
36%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 13
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$1.2M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 36% of the organizations Calm Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$63k40%
FY202311$65k36%
FY202213$70k46%
FY202112$69k42%
FY202013$49k54%
FY201910$52k30%
FY201813$50k38%
FY201711$39kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$157kEducation$90kAnimals$68kCommunity Improvement$58kHuman Services$24kPhilanthropy$20kFood & Nutrition$18kCrime & Legal$9kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Youth Documentary Academy$33,50061%
Exponential Impact$30,00033%
Yu Ming Charter School$30,00030%
Peak Education$17,50031%
INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak$12,0002n/a
Concrete Couch$12,00032%
Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc$11,00020%
Thrive Co$10,0001n/a
Recidiviz Inc$8,7501n/a
Fresh Food Connect$6,00011%
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Calm Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Youth Documentary Academy$33,50061%
Exponential Impact$30,00033%
Yu Ming Charter School$30,00030%
Peak Education$17,50031%
INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak$12,0002n/a
Concrete Couch$12,00032%
Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc$11,00020%
Thrive Co$10,0001n/a
Recidiviz Inc$8,7501n/a
Fresh Food Connect$6,00011%
Patty Jewett Neighborhood Association$5,0001n/a
Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center$5,0001n/a
Trails and Open Space Coalition$5,00011%
The Place$5,00010%
Care and Share Inc$5,00010%
Food to Power (Fka Colorado Springs Food Rescue)$5,00010%
Rocky Mountain Highway$2,50011%
Center for Nonprofit Excellence$2,50011%
Blue Star Recyclers$2,50010%
Advancing the Gospel in Angola Inc$2,00010%
Cheyenne Mountain Public Broadcast House$2,00010%
Roundup Fellowship$2,00010%
Blackpackers$1,000125%
Peak Partnership$1,00011%

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($240k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Calm Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 19 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Documentary Academy: $33,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetExponential Impact: $30,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetYu Ming Charter School: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPeak Education: $17,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetConcrete Couch: $12,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetRocky Mountain Public Media Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFresh Food Connect: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTrails and Open Space Coalition: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Place: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFood to Power (Fka Colorado Springs Food Rescue): $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRocky Mountain Highway: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCenter for Nonprofit Excellence: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBlue Star Recyclers: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAdvancing the Gospel in Angola Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCheyenne Mountain Public Broadcast House: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRoundup Fellowship: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlackpackers: $1,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetPeak Partnership: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph Henry Edmondson FoundationCO30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation · Bee Vradenburg Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Ent Credit Union · The John E and Margaret L Lane Foundation · Esther M & Freeman E Everett Charitable · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Calm Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Calm Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Calm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Calm Foundation

How much does Calm Foundation give?
Calm Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $62,537 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Calm Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (34%), Education (19%), Animals (15%).
Who are Calm Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Youth Documentary Academy ($34k), Exponential Impact ($30k), Yu Ming Charter School ($30k).
Does Calm Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Calm Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Calm Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation, Pikes Peak Community Foundation, El Pomar Foundation.
Where is Calm Foundation based?
Calm Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Calm’s filings →

More from the funding graph