· Public charity
California Correctional Peace Officers Association
To promote and improve the california correctional peace officer profession and enhance the welfare and professional status of those engaged in such work or related employment.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $725,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $862,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $137,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT | $500,000 |
| STAND UP FOR VICTIMS INC | $200,000 |
| VETS 4 HUNTN & FISHN | $15,000 |
| PARENTS OF MURDERED CHILDREN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MNMAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +40%
- POPARENTS OF MURDERED CHILDREN INC4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +10%
- LTLETTERS TO SANTA CHARITY3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +739%
Funded once
- SLSACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +33%
- 9I916 INKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +177%
- CCChildhood Cancer Foundation of Southern California Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Orange County provides a powerful voice and a meaningful connection for children who have experienced abuse, neglect and abandoment.
To advocate for families that are impacted by police violence.
Mothers Against Murder ("MAM") is dedicated to supporting, advocating for, empowering, and protecting the rights of crime victims. Our primary exempt purpose is to assist survivors of homicide, including the families, friends, and…
Breaking down barriers between lawmakers & youth by centering voices & stories of young people in policymaking at local, state, & federal levels. We are working on a nationwide campaign to uplift survivors of child sexual abuse and provide…
Small talk provides a safe space for children to share their stories of abuse and heal through forensic interviews, community awareness, and trauma informed counseling services.
Felony Murder Elimination Project is a grassroots organization of families and community members impacted by incarceration. Our goal is to eliminate the felony murder rule from California law and bring an end to extreme sentences,…
Fly's mission is to partner with youth to unlock their potential, disrupt the pipeline to prison, and advance justice in california and beyond. fly envisions a country where all kids grow up valued and supported, and the pipeline to prison…
Organization's history since 1998, each one reach one (eoro) has remained dedicated to its mission to divert incarcerated youth from a life in prison to become productive community members through mentor-based performing arts and academic…
Provide scholarships to the children of injured workers in california.
CYC was established in 1988 after several years of increasing youth participation in California. CYC opened a statewide office in San Francisco in 1995, and transitioned to a fully remote workforce across the state in 2024. Our membership…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Northeastern & Central California and the most unlike its peers is Vets 4 Huntn & Fishn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS UNITED OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds STAND UP FOR VICTIMS INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MINORITIES IN LAW ENFORCEMENT ↗
- Who funds VETS 4 HUNTN & FISHN ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND MILITARY INSTITUTE COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF MURDERED CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds LETTERS TO SANTA CHARITY ↗
- Who funds PRO Youth and Families ↗
- Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES ↗
- Who funds 916 INK ↗
- Who funds Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern California Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Kelly Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The California Endowment · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Correctional Peace Officers Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.