Skip to content
C2c Innovative Solutions Inc at a glance

· Public charity

C2c Innovative Solutions Inc

Provide best value administrative services and quality management principles that promote continuous improvement.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$33MHousing & Shelter$54kHuman Services$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.0M
$5,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$246M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TMF HEALTH QUALITY INSTITUTE$6,000,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$14,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S$10,000
DREAMS COME TRUE$7,200
DANIEL MEMORIAL INC$5,500
GABRIEL HOUSE OF CARE$5,100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,050
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,005
CECIL FIELD POW MIA MEMORIAL INC$5,001
CITY RESCUE MISSION$5,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $12k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $10k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 5 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$33M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+83%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF JACKSONVILLE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +85%
  • CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $22k · revenue +137%
  • DC
    DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $17k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
2
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Indiana Inc

To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.

—
3
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Oregon and Southwest Washington

The organization provides a "home away from home" to families with seriously ill children, and supports initiatives to improve pediatric health.

Health
5
Ronald Mcdonald House of New York Inc

Our mission is to provide a strong, caring and seamless circle of support for patients of pediatric cancer and other complex illnesses and their families. in recent years rmhny has expanded its footprint across the boroughs and extended…

Health
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Wichita Inc

To provide vital resources and compassionate care to children and their families being served by community health care providers.

Health
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
8
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc

The mission of the ronald mcdonald house of houston, inc. is to offer a home away from home and to provide care, compassion, and hope to families with seriously ill children being treated in texas medical center member institutions.

Health
9
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Charleston South Carolina Inc

We provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare with a vision of a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children.

Health
11
Ronald Mcdonald House of Central & Northern New Jersey Inc

Provide a "home away from home" for the families of seriously ill children receiving care at medical facilities near their locations in new brunswick, neptune and long branch, new jersey.

—
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Triangle

The mission of rmhc is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. our vision is a world where all children have access to medical care and their families are…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Jacksonville Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cecil Field Powmia Memorial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TMF HEALTH QUALITY INSTITUTE: $33,000,000 · HealthTMF HEALTH QUALITY INSTITUTE+5 more: $92,505 · HealthCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $32,501 · OtherDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $17,200 · OtherCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $21,955 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,050 · Human ServicesSAINT ANDREW'S LIGHTHOUSE INC: $5,100 · Housing & ShelterCECIL FIELD POWMIA MEMORIAL INC: $5,001 · Public Benefit
Health$33,092,505Other$49,701Human Services$37,005Housing & Shelter$5,100Public Benefit$5,001

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTMF HEALTH QUALITY INSTITUTE: $33,000,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $62,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $21,955 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $17,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDANIEL MEMORIAL INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANDREW'S LIGHTHOUSE INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCECIL FIELD POWMIA MEMORIAL INC: $5,001 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pga Tour IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Pga Tour IncFL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C2c Innovative Solutions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C2c Innovative Solutions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C2c Innovative Solutions’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home