Skip to content

· Private foundation

C Stone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$984k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MPhilanthropy$820kEnvironment$530kEducation$473kArts & Culture$305kHuman Services$280kScience & Tech$170kCrime & Legal$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $450k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$200,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Families SCN2A Foundation$984,390
United Way of Lewis & Clark Area$500,000
MCC Foundation Inc$300,000
Dr Cathy Lord Longitudinal Study of Autism$200,000
Good Samaritan Ministries$150,000
Singing Waters Montana$100,000
Plymouth Congregational Church$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Good Samaritan Ministries: $150k → 22%Exploration Works: $30k → 9%Exploration Works: $30k → 9%Exploration Works: $30k → 9%Exploration Works: $30k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Exploration Works: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Exploration Works: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $20k → 9%Intermountain Children's Home: $10k → 9%Exploration Works: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
PA
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+74%

Still filing today

83%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $360k · revenue +32%
  • SW
    Singing Waters Montana
    5× · 2020–2024 · $340k · revenue +83% · 42% of their budget
  • EI
    EXPLORATIONWORKS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CM
    Central Montana Medical Center FND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • WC
    WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montana Chamber of Commerce

To create and sustain an optimal business climate, business prosperity and a strong montana economy through advocacy, education and collaboration, working to provide an empowered and educated workforce, reduce business growth obstacles,…

—
2
Scenic Montana Trails
—
3
Prickly Pear Land Trust

To inspire connections to the landscapes, water, wildlife, recreation and agricultural heritage of west-central montana through conservation, now and for future generations.

Environment
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Montana Technological University Foundation

The mission of the montana tech foundation is to advance the teaching, research and public service endeavors of montana tech by generating private contributions to supplement the institution's state and federal revenues for capital,…

Education
6
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
7
Montana Conservation Voters Education Fund

The montana conservation voters education fund educates, engages, and empowers all montanans to protect our clean air, clean water, public lands, and democracy.

Environment
8
Montana Contractors Association Inc

Promotion and development of montana's construction industry.

—
9
Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Flathead Land Trust

Flathead land trust is dedicated to the conservation of northwest montana's land and water legacy through voluntary agreements with private land owners. flt's primary program service is private land conservation through voluntary…

Environment
12
Montana Association of Conservation Districts

To heighten the public's awareness of conservation districts and their activities as well as to promote soil and water conservation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Singing Waters Montana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way of Lewis & Clark Area: $500,000 · OtherUnited Way of Lewis & Clark AreaMCC Foundation Inc: $300,000 · OtherMCC Foundation IncDr Cathy Lord Longitudinal Study of Autism: $200,000 · OtherDr Cathy Lord Longitudinal Study of Autis…Helena Symphony: $140,000 · OtherHelena SymphonyGODS LOVE: $60,000 · OtherMONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $100,000 · OtherMONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT+8 more: $207,000 · Other+8 moreTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC: $984,390 · HealthTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION…ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $360,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAI…CARROLL COLLEGE: $108,250 · EducationCARROLL COLLE…+2 more: $8,000 · EducationEXPLORATIONWORKS INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesEXPLORATIONW…GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $150,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARIT…Intermountain Childrens Home: $130,000 · Human ServicesIntermountai…Singing Waters Montana: $340,000 · Recreation & SportsSinging W…THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $120,000 · EnvironmentWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST: $50,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE MYRNA LOY: $130,000 · Arts & CultureMONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,507,000Health$984,390Education$476,250Human Services$450,000Recreation & Sports$340,000Environment$190,000Arts & Culture$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC: $984,390 over 1y, 32% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $360,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSinging Waters Montana: $340,000 over 5y, 42% of budgetEXPLORATIONWORKS INC: $170,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $150,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetIntermountain Childrens Home: $130,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MYRNA LOY: $130,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $120,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $108,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $100,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Singing Waters Montana ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATIONWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Childrens Home ↗
  • Who funds THE MYRNA LOY ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Treacy FoundationMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Treacy Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C Stone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C Stone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to C Stone Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to C Stone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C Stone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph