Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

C M H Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Environment$132kInternational$106kFood & Nutrition$74kHousing & Shelter$48kHealth$46kCrime & Legal$44kAnimals$43kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $103k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
African Educate$20,000
Preble Street$11,165
Good Sheperd Food Bank$10,542
Saco Food Pantry$10,542
Miracle German Shepherd Dog Rescue of Maine$10,542
Loon Echo Land Trust$10,000
Cheshire Health Foundation$10,000
The Community Kitchen$10,000
Lakes Environmental Association$10,000
Cedarcrest Center for Children with Disabilities$5,000
Marian Fathers of the Immaculate Conception$4,125
Keene Housing Kids Collaborative$4,125
First Congregational Church$3,500
Greater Keene Pops Choir$2,500
Marginal Way Preservation Fund$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Love Your Brain Foundation: $5k → 9%New Hampshire Food Bank: $5k → 7%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%New Hampshire Food Bank: $1k → 7%Preble Street: $11k → 7%Preble Street: $5k → 7%Preble Street: $5k → 7%Preble Street: $4k → 7%Preble Street: $3k → 7%Preble Street: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MA
IN
PA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$523k · 27 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$523k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +26%
  • TM
    The Monadnock Conservancy
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +68%
  • MG
    MIRACLE GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG RESCUE OF MAINE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $36k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -7%
  • BH
    Boothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -72%
  • SY
    SAVE YOUR ASS LONG EAR RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
3
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

—
4
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
5
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
6
Maine Farmland Trust

Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.

Food & Nutrition
7
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
8
Upper Saco Valley Land Trust

The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…

Food & Nutrition
9
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
10
Mahoosuc Land Trust Inc

To protect and conserve land and traditional land uses including farming, recreation, significant habitats, scenery, and water resources for the benefit of the public. The organization facilitates community-based conservation.

Environment
11
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
12
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Monadnock Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Saco Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Land TrustsEmergency Food & Senior Ser…Local History MuseumsRegional Health SystemsChild & Family Support Serv…Alternative Early Childhood…Animal Rescue and Rehabilit…Faith-Based International M…Professional Trade Associat…Community Arts Performance …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%3%<5yr12%6%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr12%9%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr17%18%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
9%
779/8,742

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Monadnock Conservancy — $36,415 · EnvironmentThe Monadnock Conservanc…Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $23,687 · EnvironmentCoastal Maine Botanical …Loon Echo Land Trust Inc — $23,500 · EnvironmentLoon Echo Land Trust IncLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION — $23,000 · EnvironmentLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSO…Boothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation — $12,000 · EnvironmentBoothbay Harbor Waterfro…Maine Audubon Society — $8,550 · EnvironmentMaine Audubon Society+3 more — $4,545 · EnvironmentFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $21,000 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHMt Caesar Union Library Association — $15,000 · OtherMt Caesar Union Library AssociationBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NH — $15,000 · OtherBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NHChildren's Advocacy Center of Androscoggin Franklin & Oxford Counties — $11,000 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Center of Andro…Hundred Nights Shelter — $10,790 · OtherHundred Nights ShelterCharlestown Food Shelf — $8,000 · OtherCedarcrest Center for Children with Disabilities — $7,875 · OtherTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $19,616 · OtherTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIAN…KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE — $6,625 · OtherCheshire Health Foundation — $18,615 · OtherCheshire Health FoundationTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $11,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATIONCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $7,500 · Other+10 more — $40,453 · Other+10 moreAFRICAN EDUCATE — $100,201 · PhilanthropyAFRICAN EDUCATETHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $38,615 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNI…SACO FOOD PANTRY — $10,542 · Food & NutritionSACO FOOD P…Good Shepherd Food Bank — $10,542 · Food & NutritionGood Shephe…PREBLE STREET — $31,040 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $6,450 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,000 · Human ServicesLOVE YOUR BRAIN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG RESCUE OF MAINE — $36,230 · AnimalsSAVE YOUR ASS LONG EAR RESCUE — $7,000 · AnimalsTHE COLONIAL THEATRE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER — $6,115 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,200 · Arts & Culture
Environment$131,697Other$192,474Philanthropy$100,201Food & Nutrition$59,699Human Services$48,490Animals$43,230Arts & Culture$37,315

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAFRICAN EDUCATE — $100,201 over 6y, 28% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $38,615 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetThe Monadnock Conservancy — $36,415 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIRACLE GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG RESCUE OF MAINE — $36,230 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetPREBLE STREET — $31,040 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLONIAL THEATRE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCoastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $23,687 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLoon Echo Land Trust Inc — $23,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION — $23,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $19,616 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCheshire Health Foundation — $18,615 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBoothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation — $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACO FOOD PANTRY — $10,542 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $10,542 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Audubon Society — $8,550 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE YOUR ASS LONG EAR RESCUE — $7,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE — $6,625 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $6,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER — $6,115 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE YOUR BRAIN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBucknell University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CHARTER SCHOOL — $3,928 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARK THEATRE INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS — $1,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOFFORD LAKE ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Hoffman Family Founda…National Grange Mutua…Maine Community Found…Davis Conservation Fo…Mascoma Bank Foundati…The Kingsbury FundThe Eppes - Jefferson…Cogswell Benevolent T…Timken Co Charitable …Eversource Energy Fou…Fidelity Foundation
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH29.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Hoffman Family Foundation · National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Davis Conservation Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization C M H Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to C M H Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to C M H Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines