Skip to content
C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$191kArts & Culture$107kYouth Development$88kEducation$80kReligion$70kHuman Services$49kPhilanthropy$35kHousing & Shelter$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF SF FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIVE AMERICAN JUMPSTART$10,000
SANTA FE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS$8,000
SANTA FE CONCERT BAND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LIFE CIRCLE$5,000
GIRL'S INC$5,000
THE SANTA FE SYMPHONY$5,000
POJOAQUE BIBLE SCHOOL$3,000
SANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$3,000
SANTA FE YOUTH WORKS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $5k → 12%SANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR: $9k → 12%SANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR: $10k → 12%SANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 24 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$602k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+17%

Still filing today

58%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $91k · revenue +52%
  • SF
    SANTA FE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +109%
  • SM
    St Michaels High School Foundation
    5× · 2018–2022 · $68k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SV
    St Vincent Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +84%
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • SF
    SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
2
Santa Fe Recovery Center Inc

Santa fe recovery center works with individuals to sustain lasting recovery from substance use disorders and related behavioral health disorders by providing culturally proficient, evidence-based treatment and education in partnership with…

Health
3
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
4
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
5
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
6
Santa Fe Indian School

Provide educational and residential opportunities for native american children in grades 7-12.

Education
7
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
8
Santa Fe Playhouse

Santa fe playhouse creates community on stage and off by holding space for unexpected conversations through intriguing and vital programming. we create community by: -connecting artists with audiences through theatre. this includes: new…

Arts & Culture
9
Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce

The santa fe chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen the local economy and serve as the voice of business in community affairs.

—
10
Santafe Senior Living Foundation Inc

To enrich the life of each senior we serve.

Housing & Shelter
11
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
12
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Miracle Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $69,000 · OtherSANTA FE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INCTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INCLENSIC PERFORMING CENTER: $42,500 · OtherLENSIC PERFORMING CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $30,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROTARY CLUB OF SF FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SF FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $20,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherSANTA FE CHRISTINO CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION SANTA FE POST: $15,000 · Other+29 more: $161,850 · Other+29 moreST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $90,500 · HealthST VINCENT HOSPITAL FO…St Vincent Hospital: $40,000 · HealthSt Vincent HospitalCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $15,000 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR …Life Circle: $15,000 · HealthLife CircleSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $8,000 · HealthSt Michaels High School Foundation: $67,581 · Crime & LegalSt Michae…SANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR: $34,200 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMING HOME CONNECTION: $5,000 · Human ServicesSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10,000 · PhilanthropyINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC: $20,250 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · InternationalUnited by Friendship Inc: $5,000 · International
Other$445,150Health$168,500Crime & Legal$67,581Human Services$49,200Philanthropy$45,000Housing & Shelter$32,750International$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $90,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSANTA FE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $69,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSt Michaels High School Foundation: $67,581 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR: $34,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC: $20,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLife Circle: $15,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTHWORKS: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetCOMING HOME CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREADING QUEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnited by Friendship Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds St Michaels High School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Vincent Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA EL MIRADOR ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds Life Circle ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHWORKS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN JUMP START ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMING HOME CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds READING QUEST ↗
  • Who funds United by Friendship Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Anchorum St VincentPnm Tnmp FoundationSt Vincent HospitalNancy Ann Mellen Foun…The Frost FoundationThornburg FoundationThe Abeles FoundationBattelle Memorial Ins…Rotary Club of Santa …Jonathan & Kathleen A…Lineberry Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM35.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc · Jonathan & Kathleen Altman Fndtn · Lineberry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C & I Roybal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home