Skip to content

· Private foundation

Byron J & Linda a Stigge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$207kHuman Services$116kArts & Culture$36kEmployment$31kCrime & Legal$15kReligion$11k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CUES FUND$6,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC$5,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
SKUTT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
MOUNT MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT$5,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA$2,500
RONCALLI HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
AFRICAN EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT$1,000
PROJECT HARMONY$1,000
NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA$1,000
THE SUNNY SIDE FOUNDATION$1,000
BETHLEHEM HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%CUES FUND: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $6k → 20%LEWIS CENTRAL CSD: $5k → 12%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 8%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%CUES FUND: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%URBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $5k → 17%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5k → 20%CUES FUND: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK AND NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT: $13k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT: $13k → 12%CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT: $5k → 12%SKUTT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%SKUTT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%FURNITURE PROJECT: $10k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $25k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $18k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $13k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $10k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $10k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $6k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $5k → 12%NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $5k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $20k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $11k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $10k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $10k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $10k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $5k → 12%MOUNT MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%ST CECILIA CATHEDRAL: $5k → 12%MT MICHAEL BENEDICTINE ABBEY: $3k → 12%ST CECILIA'S CATHEDRAL: $5k → 12%CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Byron J & Linda a Stigge Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Byron J & Linda a Stigge Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 14 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$379k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionCivil RightsEmploymentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +70%
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +43%
  • CF
    CUES FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • FP
    FURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • UJ
    URBAN JUSTICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • SC
    SAINT CECILIAS CATHEDRAL CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
5
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
6
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
7
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
8
Omaha Church Center Inc

None

—
9
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
10
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
11
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
12
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Furniture Project Omaha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHA: $91,650 · OtherNOTRE DAME SISTERS OF OMAHAIndividual grant recipient: $71,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSKUTT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $11,450 · OtherBETHLEHEM HOUSE: $10,500 · Other+13 more: $38,250 · Other+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $67,200 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASK…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITYCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $36,275 · ReligionCATHEDRAL ARTS PR…CUES FUND: $27,000 · ReligionCUES FUNDGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK & NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $31,000 · EmploymentFURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterPROJECT HARMONY: $6,000 · Crime & LegalADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 · Civil Rights
Other$222,850Education$79,700Religion$63,275Employment$31,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Crime & Legal$6,000Civil Rights$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $67,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $36,275 over 6y, 10% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK & NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCUES FUND: $27,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE: $10,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEW YORK & NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CUES FUND ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Byron J & Linda a Stigge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Byron J & Linda a Stigge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Byron J & Linda a Stigge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph