Skip to content

· Public charity

Bwl Charities Inc

We believe everyone has something to give and that privately funding deserving children's charities is a worthwhile endeavor.

$40k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Health$61kYouth Development$27kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$1k
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$12,500
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
ADNP KIDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$7,500
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$5,000
2LOVE LLC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%2LOVE LLC: $5k → 10%CHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%PATH TO SHINE: $1k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $1k → 13%PATH ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ADNP KIDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $3k → 13%CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER: $5k → 14%PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER: $2k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $18k → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $3k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $13k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $3k → 13%INSPIREDU: $5k → 13%HANDS ON ATLANTA: $3k → 13%SONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $685 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 3 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$60k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    3× · 2019–2021 · $38k · revenue +26%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • Cure Childhood Cancer Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • PA
    PATH ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CF
    CHORDOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • II
    INSPIREDU INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
3
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
4
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
5
Partnership for Cures

Cures Within Reach leverages the speed, safety and cost-effectiveness of testing approved therapies for new indications/diseases without effective treatment driving more treatments quicker to more patients.

Health
6
Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disease that causes loss of muscle control and balance, cancer, lung disease, and immune system problems in children and young adults, shortening their lives. The nonprofit A-T Children's Project…

Science & Tech
7
Curenfwithjack

The mission of CureNFwithJack is to accelerate awareness and find a cure or effective treatment through the funding of research. CureNFwithJack provides seed money for innovate research in multiple areas, including but not limited to drug…

Education
8
Cure Cmd

Cure CMDs mission is to advance research toward treatments for the congenital muscular dystrophies and empower those living with CMD through engagement and support of our community.

Health
9
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
10
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
11
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
12
Cure Rare Disease Inc

Our mission is to enable and finance the development of life-saving genetic medicines for ultra-rare patient populations previously deemed too rare to treat. to realize this, our unique ecosystems facilitates collaboration between…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Path to Shine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $37,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DADNP KIDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthADNP KIDS RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $7,153 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer IncCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCHORDOMA FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,250 · HealthPATH ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherPATH ACADEMY2LOVE LLC: $5,000 · Other2LOVE LLCCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $2,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCA…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $1,076 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOU…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…PATH TO SHINE: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentPATH TO SHINESONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $685 · Youth DevelopmentINSPIREDU INC: $5,000 · EducationInterfaith Outreach Home Inc: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterHands on Atlanta Inc: $2,500 · PhilanthropyATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Health$58,403Other$18,576Youth Development$16,935Education$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,500Philanthropy$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADNP KIDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $7,153 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIREDU INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInterfaith Outreach Home Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHands on Atlanta Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $685 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Imlay Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Imlay Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bwl Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bwl Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bwl Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bwl Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $72k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bwl Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph