Skip to content

· Private foundation

Business & Education as Mission

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MEducation$786kInternational$416kPhilanthropy$66kScience & Tech$54kHealth$25kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,761
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH AND LEARNING INTERNATIONAL$3,761
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($537k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ALLIANCE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
IA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($537k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ukraine$281k · 10 grants
Russia$257k · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Business & Education as Mission’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Business & Education as Missionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 38% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 18 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$2.6M
$338k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+41%

Still filing today

44%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MISSION EURASIA
    6× · 2017–2023 · $835k · revenue +180%
  • SL
    Scholar Leaders International
    2× · 2022–2023 · $250k · revenue +150%
  • AF
    A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $181k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • SG
    ST GREGORY THE THEOLOGIAN CHARITY
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • RG
    RESONATE GLOBAL MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • CM
    CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
3
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
4
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
5
Russian Leadership Ministries

Prepare pastoral and congregational leaders of churches to impact russia with the gospel of jesus christ

Philanthropy
6
Eurasia Partners Network Inc

To accelerate indigenous, Gospel-centered church-planting movements in Eurasia through coaching, connecting and resourcing, and other strategies to share the Gospel as opportunities arise.

Unclassified
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
9
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
10
Equip Ministries International

Equip ministries trains overseas pastors and leaders, empowers the church, provides humanitarian aid, and attempts to reach the unreached peoples around the world by working with church leaders to fulfil

Religion
11
Instep Ministries International

To bring encouragement, spiritual equipping to the church leaders and lead the way to revival for the church in russia and throughout eastern europe.

Religion
12
Leading Edge International Ltd

We increase the capacity of local Christian leaders to rebuild faith communities founded on relationships of love and trust. We look for servant leaders who competently serve the spiritually seeking the emotionally exhausted or physically…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia; the most unlike its peers is Mecs Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION EURASIA: $835,000 · ReligionMISSION EURASIAMECS Ministries: $100,000 · ReligionMECS MinistriesInternational Messengers: $47,800 · Religion+4 more: $83,865 · Religion+4 moreLCC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherLCC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INC: $140,000 · OtherONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INCCENTER OF EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE: $134,543 · OtherCENTER OF EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC LITE…Individual grant recipient: $96,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRECON Education Center: $95,000 · OtherRECON Education CenterCRU: $78,000 · OtherCRUNGO All Together Movement: $70,000 · OtherNGO All Together MovementST GREGORY THE THEOLOGIAN CHARITY: $50,000 · OtherLEADER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $38,000 · OtherRESONATE GLOBAL MISSION: $37,800 · Other+11 more: $161,900 · Other+11 moreScholar Leaders International: $250,000 · EducationScholar Leaders…HODOS INSTITUTE: $124,500 · EducationHODOS INSTITUTEASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $18,916 · EducationA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $180,500 · InternationalA FAMILY FO…ORPHAN'S TREE INC: $112,000 · InternationalORPHAN'S TR…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalTroika International Inc: $66,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE: $25,000 · Human Services
Religion$1,066,665Other$1,051,693Education$393,416International$297,500Philanthropy$66,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION EURASIA: $835,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetScholar Leaders International: $250,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $180,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetHODOS INSTITUTE: $124,500 over 5y, 23% of budgetORPHAN'S TREE INC: $112,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetMECS Ministries: $100,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetInternational Messengers: $47,800 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $27,104 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALLIANCE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCONNECT INTERNATIONAL: $23,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $18,916 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFaith and Learning International NFP: $3,761 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds Scholar Leaders International ↗
  • Who funds A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN ↗
  • Who funds HODOS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN'S TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds MECS Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Troika International Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Messengers ↗
  • Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Faith and Learning International NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tyndale House MinistriesIL26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · From His Hand Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Summit Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · The Bolick Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Business & Education as Mission funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Business & Education as Mission. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Business & Education as Mission?

    Find your warmest path to Business & Education as Mission through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Business & Education as Mission’s filings →

    More from the funding graph