Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burstein Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$130kHealth$46kArts & Culture$33kInternational$31kPhilanthropy$29kAnimals$29kEducation$20kEnvironment$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITERACY PARTNERS$6,100
AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT$5,000
WILMOT CANCER INSTITUTE$5,000
ARTS COUNCIL OF MONGOLIA$4,848
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HILLEL$3,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$2,000
UJA FEDERATION NEW YORK$2,000
HILLELS OF FL SUNCOAST$1,500
DENNIS CONSERVANCY LAND TRUST$1,500
CFBNJ FEED THE CHILDREN$1,000
FOREST HILLS FRIENDS$1,000
SAGE ELDERCARE$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Burstein Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Burstein Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$301k · 33 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
24

Total granted

$301k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+0%

Still filing today

36%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    PEDAL THE CAUSE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +18%
  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +215%
  • LP
    Literacy Partners Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • DD
    DR DOG TAIPEI CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • HA
    HILLEL AT THE CLAREMONT COLLEGESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue ×18
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
Rutgers Hillel Corporation

Rutgers hillel is dedicated to creating a welcoming and inclusive environment for all jewish college students, where they are encouraged to grow intellectually, spiritually and socially. the organization helps students find a balance in…

—
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus D/B/a Hillels of the Florida Suncoast

To enrich the lives of jewish student undergraduate & graduate students, so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
8
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
Hillel At Washington University in St Louis

The mission of hillel at washington university in st louis is to be a catalyst for jewish life among college students in st louis. we connect students with one another and with jewish culture and traditions through service and social…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is West Orange Animal Welfare League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARTS COUNCIL OF MONGOLIA US INC: $22,116 · OtherTHE ARTS COUNCIL OF MONGOLIA US INCHILLEL: $20,500 · OtherHILLELSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST: $20,400 · OtherSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBNAI ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE: $13,500 · OtherBNAI ISRAEL SYNAGOGUEHADASSAH: $12,500 · OtherADL: $11,500 · OtherAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HILLEL: $9,500 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HILLEL: $9,000 · Other+38 more: $89,883 · Other+38 moreJewish Federation of St Louis: $25,100 · PhilanthropyJewish Fe…STAND UP TO CANCER: $2,800 · PhilanthropySTAND UP …FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING …UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JE…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $22,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $6,000 · InternationalISRAEL EM…ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $2,000 · InternationalACTION AG…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalPEDAL THE CAUSE: $29,700 · Human ServicesLiteracy Partners Inc: $12,600 · EducationSAGE ELDERCARE: $7,510 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $6,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 · EnvironmentMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,500 · AnimalsWEST ORANGE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1,000 · AnimalsSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · Animals
Other$252,399Philanthropy$31,900International$31,000Human Services$29,700Education$27,110Environment$6,500Animals$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $29,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $25,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc: $12,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAGE ELDERCARE: $7,510 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $4,069 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $3,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE CINEMA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST ORANGE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAGE ELDERCARE ↗
  • Who funds THE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT THE CLAREMONT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE CINEMA INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burstein Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burstein Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Sage Eldercare: 1% of income from government
  • Resilient Retreat Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Burstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph