Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burns Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Youth Development$35kEducation$20kHuman Services$20kHealth$12kInternational$11kHousing & Shelter$9kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SS PHILIP & JAMES SCHOOL$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE- DENVER$3,000
SOME (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT)$2,000
COLORADO I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$2,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE- DENVER$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO DENVER$1,500
FEEDING AMERICA - FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$1,500
GIRLS INC METRO DENVER$1,500
BOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES APPEAL PHILADELPHIA$1,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$1,000
SECOND CHANCE CENTER$1,000
SAVE THE STORKS$1,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$1,000
NORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $2k → 5%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $2k → 5%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $2k → 5%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$118k · 23 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$118k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+33%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +26%
  • BC
    BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +6%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIE CHARITIES APPEAL PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OR AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
2
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
3
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
4
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
5
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
6
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
7
Mental Health Center of Denver

We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.

Health
8
Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Inc

Mission: leading and advancing collaboration to end homelessness in our region. vision: dedicated to everyone in the metro region having a safe, stable place to call home. values: committed to core values that bring people home: -…

Housing & Shelter
9
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
10
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
11
Girl Scouts of Colorado

Girl scouts of colorado prepares girls and adults to create unique leadership paths, ignite change, and share a worldwide sisterhood through traditions and new experiences. girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character,…

Youth Development
12
Youth Emergency Services Inc

Youth emergency services (yes) provides housing and support to youth experiencing instability, crisis, and homelessness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Star of Chester County and the most unlike its peers is Communities of Don Guanella and Divine Providence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SS PHILIP & JAMES SCHOOL — $15,000 · OtherSS PHILIP & JAMES SCHOOLCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION — $8,500 · OtherCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATIONSOME INC — $8,000 · OtherSOME INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $6,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCFEEDING AMERICA - FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $6,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA - FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESCURE4CAM INC — $4,500 · OtherCURE4CAM INCCatholic Social Services — $4,000 · OtherNORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY — $4,000 · OtherBOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL — $4,000 · OtherCLEAN UP THE LAKE - TAHOE — $3,000 · Other+8 more — $13,500 · Other+8 moreBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsBIG CITY M…SOS OUTREACH — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsSOS OUTREA…A PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH — $4,500 · Human ServicesSecond Chance Center Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC — $9,000 · InternationalAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $5,000 · EducationANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentSave the Storks — $4,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,000 · HealthSAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$76,500Recreation & Sports$12,000Human Services$10,000International$9,000Education$6,500Youth Development$6,000Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCURE4CAM INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Social Services — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY — $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSave the Storks — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOS OUTREACH — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCommunities of Don Guanella and Divine Providence — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Chance Center Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
  • Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC
  • Who funds CURE4CAM INC
  • Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services
  • Who funds NORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY
  • Who funds Save the Storks
  • Who funds SOS OUTREACH
  • Who funds Communities of Don Guanella and Divine Providence
  • Who funds ANDREW L HICKS JR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Second Chance Center Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burns Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Burns Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Burns Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph