Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bundy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$413k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.6MScience & Tech$600kArts & Culture$75kEducation$55kEmployment$10kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS$100,000
SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$100,000
UCLA STEIN EYE INSTITUTE$100,000
JOHN TRACY CLINIC$20,000
BLIND CHILDREN'S CENTER$15,000
NO LIMITS FOR DEAF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$15,000
BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC$13,000
WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC$10,000
ALZHEIMERS ORANGE COUNTY$10,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY$10,000
BEYOND BLINDNESS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $20k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $23k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $30k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $30k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $29k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $19k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $13k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
0%

Still filing today

40%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthScience & TechEmploymentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JT
    JOHN TRACY CLINIC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $145k · revenue +120%
  • BB
    BEYOND BLINDNESS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $119k · revenue +63%
  • BI
    BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • SB
    SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2025 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    one grant, 2025 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • AO
    ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
2
Glaucoma Institute of Beverly Hills Research Foundation Inc
Health
3
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

—
4
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
8
Blindnesss Support Services Inc

To promote the independence of individuals who are blind or visually impaired by providing information and referral services, orientation and mobility training, assistive technology, daily living skills instruction, counseling,…

Unclassified
9
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Tracy Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MED: $500,000 · OtherSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDTHE SALK INSTITUTE FOR: $500,000 · OtherTHE SALK INSTITUTE FORREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $300,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAJULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE: $300,000 · OtherJULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTEBEYOND BLINDNESS: $119,000 · OtherBEYOND BLINDNESSALZHEIMERS ASSOC OF ORANGE COUNTY: $69,000 · Other+5 more: $166,062 · Other+5 moreJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $145,323 · Human ServicesJOHN TRAC…BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $56,000 · Human ServicesBRAILLE I…Wayfinder Family Services: $20,000 · Human ServicesWayfinder…SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $100,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $10,000 · HealthThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $100,000 · Science & TechNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $55,000 · EducationGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · Employment
Other$1,954,062Human Services$221,323Health$110,000Science & Tech$100,000Arts & Culture$75,000Education$55,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $145,323 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS: $119,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC: $75,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $56,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN TRACY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BLINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
  • Who funds NO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Lon V Smith Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bundy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bundy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bundy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph