· Public charity
Building Healthy Futures
To improve the health of our community's under-served children and youth through thoughtful collaboration and advocacy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| One World Community Health Ce | $630,000 |
| Charles Drew Health Center | $400,000 |
| Child Savings Institute | $225,000 |
| Completely Kids | $157,385 |
| Center for Holistic Develop | $100,000 |
| Heart Ministry Center | $100,000 |
| Nebraska Methodist Hosp Fdn | $90,000 |
| Girls Incorporated of Omaha | $85,000 |
| Heartland Family Service | $80,000 |
| Project Harmony | $80,000 |
| Center for Immigrant & Refuge | $75,000 |
| Visiting Nurse Health Service | $75,000 |
| Creighton University | $75,000 |
| Childrens Hosp & Med Ctr Fdn | $65,000 |
| Bluebird Cultural Initiative | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +41%
- CDCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +8%
- CSCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $975k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- GJGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +528% · 34% of their budget
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +38%
- TWTHE WELLBEING PARTNERSone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…
Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…
Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.
Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…
To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.
Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
The mission of methodist fremont health is to improve the quality of life by caring for the body and mind. methodist fremont health supports its mission of caring for people through the provision of inpatient and outpatient hospital…
Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…
The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end the abuse and neglect of children and create strong and healthy families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connected Roots Care Center and the most unlike its peers is African Immigrant Family Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
- Who funds THE VISITING NURSE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds HOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BLUEBIRD CULTURAL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE WELLBEING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Kim Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Building Healthy Futures funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Building Healthy Futures?
Find your warmest path to Building Healthy Futures through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.