Skip to content

Nebraska · Nonprofit

THE WELLBEING PARTNERS

THE WELLBEING PARTNERS (Nebraska) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,345,393 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($3,029,055). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$676k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$3.3M
Net assets
$315k
7/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 59%
01What it does

What The Wellbeing Partners does

Mission

Our mission is to build wellbeing into the way our communities and businesses grow through advocacy, collaboration, and education.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2025 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

During the tax year, The Wellbeing Partners ceased conducting its health and housing program. No program services under this initiative were conducted after its cessation. The organization continues to pursue its exempt purposes through its remaining programs and activities.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Mental wellbeing campaign - the initiative includes whatmakesus, head to heart, head to heart for youth, and activate youth for mental health programs and aims to: 1) improve community perception of mental health conditions; 2) activate community members with the skills and resources needed to serve as culturally relevant mental health advocates, and 3) utilize a wrap-around educational approach to reduce the youth-mental health crisis.

    $445,640 spent$79,039 earned by the program
    78% of program spending
  2. Workplace consulting and facilitation - these services provide businesses and organizations with planning assistance, resources and networking opportunities promoting health and wellness in the workplace and community.

    $128,411 spent
    22% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $574,051.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($415k) Expenses 100 ($501k) Net assets 100 ($159k)2018 Revenue 94 ($390k) Expenses 82 ($410k) Net assets 87 ($139k)2019 Revenue 77 ($318k) Expenses 70 ($350k) Net assets 67 ($106k)2020 Revenue 340 ($1.4M) Expenses 271 ($1.4M) Net assets 102 ($162k)2021 Revenue 439 ($1.8M) Expenses 305 ($1.5M) Net assets 287 ($455k)2022 Revenue 196 ($813k) Expenses 209 ($1.0M) Net assets 139 ($220k)2023 Revenue 219 ($907k) Expenses 194 ($970k) Net assets 99 ($157k)2024 Revenue 296 ($1.2M) Expenses 176 ($880k) Net assets 317 ($503k)2025 Revenue 163 ($676k) Expenses 172 ($864k) Net assets 199 ($315k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (163)Expenses (172)Net assets (199)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $344k to $613k (+78%).

$504k
$434k
$305k
$438k
$666k
$403k
$344k
$613k
$447k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 15% · 2019 3% · 2020 6% · 2021 23% · 2022 27% · 2023 18% · 2024 24% · 2025 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$86k
’17
−$20k
’18
−$32k
’19
$52k
’20
$293k
’21
−$235k
’22
−$64k
’23
$347k
’24
−$188k
’25
4.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Aja Anderson

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018, and between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed242423272626242315
Joined·+4+3+13+9+5+1+3+3
No longer listed·4491053411
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $65k → $390k.

2 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE WELLBEING PARTNERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE WELLBEING PARTNERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91%
largest funder
95%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 96% · 2021 97% · 2022 97% · 2023 90% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of THE WELLBEING PARTNERS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of THE WELLBEING PARTNERS's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.

IL
IA
NE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
’21
’22
’23
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $40k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding THE WELLBEING PARTNERS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $100k on record.

Federal$100k
grants $100kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$100k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE WELLBEING PARTNERS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 25%Fundraising 8%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

61%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE WELLBEING PARTNERS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE WELLBEING PARTNERS?
THE WELLBEING PARTNERS (Nebraska) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,345,393 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($3,029,055). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE WELLBEING PARTNERS have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $3,345,393 in grants to THE WELLBEING PARTNERS, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE WELLBEING PARTNERS?
THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,029,055 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE WELLBEING PARTNERS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing