Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Build-A-Bear Foundation Inc

Build-a-bear foundation seeks to add a little more heart to life by sharing hugs, inspiring creativity, and making days a little bit brighter for those in need.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$2.9MPhilanthropy$760kHealth$684kPublic Safety & Disaster$429kHuman Services$285kCivil Rights$126kCommunity Improvement$53kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $1,185,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,670,696 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $485,696 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Book$1,000,000
Make A Wish Foundation of America$75,000
American Red Cross$55,000
Make A Wish Missouri$15,000
Marine Toys for Tots$10,000
National Urban League$10,000
First Responders Children's Foundation$10,000
Pflag Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $579k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Make A Wish Missouri: $25k → 11%Make A Wish Missouri: $25k → 11%Make A Wish Missouri: $25k → 11%National Urban League: $20k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%Make A Wish Missouri: $15k → 11%National Urban League: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%Make-A-Wish Foundation International: $20k → 11%National Urban League: $10k → 17%American Red Cross: $74k → 14%American Red Cross: $55k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 10 repeat orgs$577k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$4.7M
$577k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $460k · revenue +45%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $429k · revenue +30%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $429k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • B
    BABY2BABY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $150k · revenue +15%
  • SL
    St Louis Community Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TT
    THE TOY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +206%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
2
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
3
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

4
Make-a-Wish Foundation of San Diego

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

5
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
6
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

11
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
12
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyElementary Literacy TutoringVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Lgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr18%39%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr15%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr18%65%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr15%18%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,975

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BOOK — $2,731,012 · EducationFIRST BOOKSt Louis Black Authors of Childrens Literature — $140,000 · EducationMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $429,495 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDAT…BABY2BABY — $150,000 · OtherBABY2BABYSt Louis Community Foundation — $100,000 · OtherSt Louis Community …Urban League of Metro St Louis - Cash — $50,000 · OtherUrban League of Met…The Columbus Foundation - Cash — $50,000 · OtherThe Columbus Founda…Mid-Ohio Foodbank — $50,000 · OtherMid-Ohio Foodbank+5 more — $84,000 · Other+5 moreMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $460,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR…UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $250,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF G…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $429,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $90,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH …NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URB…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 · Human ServicesSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 · HealthTHE TOY FOUNDATION INC — $52,500 · Community ImprovementNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation — $35,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$2,871,012Other$913,495Philanthropy$710,000Human Services$579,000Health$150,000Community Improvement$52,500Crime & Legal$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIRST BOOK — $2,731,012 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $460,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $429,495 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $429,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $250,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBABY2BABY — $150,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSt Louis Black Authors of Childrens Literature — $140,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $90,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TOY FOUNDATION INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPFLAG — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKABOOM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Build-A-Bear Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph