Skip to content

· Private foundation

Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$28kReligion$17kHuman Services$17kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$7kEducation$4kPublic Benefit$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TennGreen Land Conservancy$10,000
Episcopal Relief and Development$2,500
Salvation Army of Nashville$2,000
Salvation Army of St Louis$2,000
Nashville Rescue Mission$2,000
AFEDJ$1,700
St Louis Area Food Bank$1,000
Alive Hospice$500
Second Harvest Food Bank$500
Hillsdale College$500
Episcopal City Mission$400
St Lois Public Radio$400
Cumberland Trails Conference$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Episcopal Relief and Development: $3k → 17%Pre Born: $300 → 16%Episcopal Relief and Development: $3k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Delvelopment: $3k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $3k → 17%Alive Hospice: $500 → 14%Alive Hospice: $200 → 14%Alive Hospice: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
CT
MO
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$78k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+7%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +40%
  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +54%
  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army St Louis
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • OF
    OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
2
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
3
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
4
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
5
Greenways for Nashville Inc

Greenways for nashville promotes, supports, and enhances a system of greenways and open space in nashville and davidson county.

Recreation & Sports
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Heritage Conservancy Inc

We are a community based organization dedicated to the preservation and protection of significant open spaces, natural resources, and our historic heritage.

Arts & Culture
8
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
9
Friends of Ga State Parks & Histori

The mission of friends is to partner with, promote and preserve georgia state parks & historic sites. statewide, friends works to raise awareness of the economic and intrinsic values of georgia's greatest treasures. we work with state and…

Human Services
10
Centennial Park Conservancy

To sustain the vibrancy of nashville's centennial park, home to the historic parthenon, by supporting metro parks in revitalizing & activating this public green space to ensure the park remains a welcoming destination for recreation,…

Arts & Culture
11
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Plantation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army of St Louis: $6,500 · OtherSalvation Army of St LouisSalvation Army of Nashville: $5,800 · OtherSalvation Army of NashvilleAFEDJ: $5,600 · OtherAFEDJST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,100 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCSalvation Army St Louis: $2,000 · OtherSalvation Army St LouisSalvation Army: $2,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyEPISCOPAL CITY MISSION: $1,600 · OtherSt Louis Public Radio: $1,500 · OtherSecond Harvest Food Bank: $1,200 · Other+8 more: $2,550 · Other+8 moreTENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsTENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY+2 more: $550 · Recreation & SportsEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELI…ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $900 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPICE …+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE …HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,100 · EducationTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Public BenefitOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$33,850Recreation & Sports$28,050Human Services$11,200Housing & Shelter$8,000Education$4,100Public Benefit$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY: $27,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN POLICY ROUNDTABLE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND TRAILS CONFERENCE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARPETH CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN POLICY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE PLANTATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND TRAILS CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds HARPETH CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist FoundationTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Henry Laird Smith Foundation · The Wade-Buntin Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buckner Family Char Foundation Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph