Skip to content

· Public charity

Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply

The Organization's primary purpose is to raise and distribute funds to qualified charitable organizations and contribute to charitable community programs.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$172kEducation$161kYouth Development$108kRecreation & Sports$64kAnimals$44kHousing & Shelter$44kHuman Services$44k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$65,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Tristesse Grief Center Inc$65,000
EPOS Outreach International Inc$65,000
Blaze's Tribute Equine Rescue$65,000
Leahs Hope$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%House of Healing Inc: $44k → 9%Leahs Hope: $65k → 16%Neighborhood Services Organization: $44k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
3
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
4
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
5
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
6
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
7
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
8
Hope House Inc
Youth Development
9
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
10
Embrace Hope Collaboratorium Inc

Embrace Hope's primary goal is to break the cycle of homelessness and reduce the number of children in foster care due to neglect and abuse by providing shelter for and serving those currently experiencing homelessness while simultaneously…

Human Services
11
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
12
Hope House Inc

Break the cycle of domestic violence by providing safe refuge and supportive services

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth & Family Services North Central Ok; the most unlike its peers is Cycles for Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TRISTESSE GRIEF CENTER INC: $65,000 · HealthTHE TRISTESSE GRIEF CENTER IN…AUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INC: $64,000 · HealthAUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INCThe Children's Center Inc: $64,000 · HealthThe Children's Center IncHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $44,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INCHOPE UNITED INC: $161,255 · EducationHOPE UNITED INCLEAHS HOPE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesLEAHS HOPE INCNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD SERVIC…House of Healing Inc: $44,000 · Human ServicesHouse of Healing In…EPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentEPOS OUTREACH IN…CYCLES FOR LIFE INC: $64,000 · Youth DevelopmentCYCLES FOR LIFE …BLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $65,000 · AnimalsBLAZE'S TRIBU…SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $44,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE…FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $64,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK: $44,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$237,000Education$161,255Human Services$153,000Youth Development$129,000Animals$109,000Recreation & Sports$64,000Housing & Shelter$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE UNITED INC: $161,255 over 1y, 49% of budgetEPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $65,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INC: $64,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $64,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK: $44,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $44,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $44,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $44,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHouse of Healing Inc: $44,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Butterfield Memorial Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Servant Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Youth & Family Services North Central Ok: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply?

Find your warmest path to Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bryant Foundation of Locke Supply’s filings →

More from the funding graph