Loading…
Loading…
Oklahoma · Nonprofit
CYCLES FOR LIFE INC (Oklahoma) is funded by 9 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $170,704 in grants to it, the largest being BRYANT FOUNDATION OF LOCKE SUPPLY ($64,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CYCLES FOR LIFE INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,608 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,608 youth development nonprofits under $100k, FY2018
The base broadened — 1 funders to 3 as grant income moved $20k → $85k.
5 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CYCLES FOR LIFE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CYCLES FOR LIFE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 37% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 40% · 2023 63% · 2024 75% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
0% of CYCLES FOR LIFE INC's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 11% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
CYCLES FOR LIFE INC is locally rooted: 71% of its grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2018 (financials across 2018–2018), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing