Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
75
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$263kEducation$148kHuman Services$71kHealth$54kYouth Development$44kAnimals$38kArts & Culture$36kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k73 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT ST MARY FOUNDATION$15,000
MONSIGNOR ALLEN TRUST AND DEV FUND$10,000
HOLY SOULS CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,000
HOLY SOULS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
GIRL SCOUTS$2,500
NATURAL STATE COUNCIL$2,500
ACCESS ACADEMY$2,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS$2,000
MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY$2,000
METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH AR$2,000
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$2,000
NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION$2,000
CHS FOUNDATION$2,000
LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST: $1k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $2k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $2k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $2k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $1k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $1k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
OH
PA
CT
RI
AR
TN
SC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$681k · 80 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 64 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
22

Total granted

$681k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-10%

Still filing today

36%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +52%
  • ML
    MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARKANSAS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +6%
  • LO
    LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SA
    SCULPTURE AT THE RIVER MARKET INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -18%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF HOLY SOULS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • TG
    THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Education Association

Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Education
2
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
3
Arkansas Wildlife Federation Inc

To ensure a thriving future for arkansas wildlife. the organization serves as an independent voice for all species of arkansas wildlife, a reliable source of factual information, and an inclusive partner toward the conservation and…

Animals
4
Arkansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Arkansas farm bureau foundation (the "foundation") is organized for charitable and educational purposes to further the understanding of agricultural and rural issues, and to support the agricultural and rural community through financial…

Food & Nutrition
5
Arkansas Community Foundation Inc

Arkansas community foundation engages people, connects resources and inspires solutions to build community.

Philanthropy
6
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
7
Northwest Arkansas Land Trust

To preserve and enhance quality of life for all people in northwest arkansas through the permanent protection of land.

Environment
8
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
9
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
10
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
11
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
12
United Way of Southeast Ark Inc

Fund raising and agency allocations

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Austin Foundation for Architecture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
21/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mount St Mary Foundation: $145,000 · OtherMount St Mary FoundationMONSIGNOR ALLEN TRUST AND DEV FUND: $50,000 · OtherMONSIGNOR ALLEN TRUST AND DEV FUNDCHS FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $27,000 · Other+88 more: $379,450 · Other+88 moreUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $7,000 · EducationBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSCULPTURE AT THE RIVER MARKET INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY: $3,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $8,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE CALL: $2,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $1,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF PULASKI COUNTY: $6,000 · AnimalsDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $4,000 · AnimalsCENTRAL ARKANSAS RESCUE EFFORT FOR ANIMALS INC: $3,000 · AnimalsMIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARKANSAS INC: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsARKANSAS TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWOLFE STREET FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $3,000 · Health
Other$634,450Education$37,000Arts & Culture$29,000Human Services$20,000Animals$20,000Recreation & Sports$18,500Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCULPTURE AT THE RIVER MARKET INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARKANSAS INC: $10,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $8,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPOTLUCK INC: $7,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOLFE STREET FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE ROCK GARDEN CLUB: $6,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PULASKI COUNTY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL STATE COUNCIL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPathfinder Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ARKANSAS RESCUE EFFORT FOR ANIMALS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUAPAW QUARTER ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAustin Foundation for Architecture: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPTA ARKANSAS CONGRESS FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LITTLE ROCK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS AUTISM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SCULPTURE AT THE RIVER MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ALDERSGATE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds POTLUCK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WOLFE STREET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE ROCK GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PULASKI COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR53× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · St Vincent Infirmary Medical Center · The Hussman Foundation · Landers Family Charitable Foundation · Clarence E Anthony Charitable Trust · Lpr Foundation · Roy & Christine Sturgis Charitable & Educational Trust · Rebsamen Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brown Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph