· Private foundation
Landers Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of LANDERS FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST PENTECOSTAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| FRIENDLY CHAPEL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADCOVACY CENTER | $10,000 |
| AR CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $9,200 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| SHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| MAMAS UNIDAS LITTLE ROCK | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +145% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CALL3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +37%
- OHOUR HOUSE INC3× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +145%
- WSWOLFE STREET FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +890%
Funded once
- AGAR GAME & FISH COMMISSIONone grant, 2020 · $26k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $11k
- WCWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +342%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.
Arkansas hospice foundation is a non-profit, charitable 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to raise public awareness and financial support for arkansas hospice and related organization's programs and services, and to help donors meet…
To provide medical care to the uninsured.
To restore hope, empower people and save lives through suicide awareness and crisis intervention service for those experiencing crisis in arkansas
To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…
Fund raising and agency allocations
To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…
We build, strengthen and restore arkansas families for god's glory.
Arkansas community foundation engages people, connects resources and inspires solutions to build community.
To support operations of northwest arkansas children's shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolfe Street Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CALL ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds COSMOS CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOLFE STREET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ARKANSAS PROGRAMS & SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Brown Foundation · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Eric Scott Bottin Foundation · James I Freeman Charitable Trust · Lpr Foundation · Frank D Hickingbotham Foundation Trust · Central Arkansas Planning & Development District Inc · The Hussman Foundation · George H Dunklin Jr Charitable Foundation · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Landers Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.