Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$358k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$769kEnvironment$431kFood & Nutrition$397kHealth$258kAnimals$166kReligion$91kHuman Services$66kArts & Culture$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$724k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRISTO RAY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$60,000
FIRST FRUITS FARM INC$60,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$40,000
KIPP BALTIMORE$30,000
VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC$20,000
BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC$15,000
SAINT IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMY$15,000
HEALTHY PENINSULA$14,000
ST FRANCIS XAVIER CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
GREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB$10,000
MARYLAND SPCA$10,000
IRVINE NATURE CENTER INC$10,000
B MORE CLUBHOUSE INC$8,000
LADEW TOPIARY GARDENS$8,000
AROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $8k → 11%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $4k → 11%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $4k → 9%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $4k → 11%TREE OF LIFE: $10k → 11%TREE OF LIFE: $10k → 11%TREE OF LIFE: $5k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $5k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $5k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $5k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $5k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $3k → 11%ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 36 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
10

Total granted

$2.2M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+25%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FIRST FRUITS FARM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $267k · revenue +68%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $222k · revenue +53%
  • KB
    KIPP BALTIMORE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $191k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • WC
    WASHINGTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +21%
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE - KIMMEL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TO
    TREE OF LIFE FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maryland Agricultural Resource Council Inc

For the benefit of the citizens of md to enhance their knowledge and appreciation for agricultural businesses. to educate and assist farmers in developing agricultural operations that are viable and environmentally sustainable.

—
2
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
3
Maryland Independent College & University Association Inc

Serving the interests of independent higher education and supporting the work of campus leaders throughout the state of maryland.

—
4
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
5
Baltimore County Farm Bureau Inc

The baltimore county farm bureau is a grass roots, non-governmental, voluntary associaton whose mission is to promote and protect maryland agriculture and rural life.

—
6
Baltimore Tree Trust Inc

To restore baltimore's urban forest through increased tree planting, community engagement, and advocacy.

Environment
7
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
8
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
9
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
Baltimore Montessori Inc

To nurture a love of learning in a small family-like environment by providing an extraordinary and proven montessori public school experience for families in baltimore city.

Education
11
Baltimore Green Space

Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.

Environment
12
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forever Maryland Inc; the most unlike its peers is B'more Clubhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLSAINT IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMY: $120,000 · OtherSAINT IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMYHEALTHY PENINSULA: $95,000 · OtherHEALTHY PENINSULATHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $75,000 · OtherTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INCST FRANCIS XAVIER CATHOLIC CHURCH: $62,000 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER CATHOLIC CHURCHLADEW TOPIARY GARDENS: $60,000 · OtherLADEW TOPIARY GARDENSTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 · Other+20 more: $186,000 · Other+20 moreCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $222,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FO…IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $73,000 · EnvironmentIRVINE NATURAL SC…GREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentGREEN SPRING VALL…+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentKIPP BALTIMORE INC: $191,000 · EducationKIPP BALTIMORE …BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $83,000 · EducationBALTIMORE EDUCA…TRINITY COLLEGE: $24,000 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGEWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationWASHINGTON COLL…FIRST FRUITS FARM INC: $267,000 · Food & NutritionFIRST FRUITS …THE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $62,000 · AnimalsMIDATLANTIC HORSE RESCUE INC: $59,000 · AnimalsTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · AnimalsMARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · AnimalsB'MORE CLUBHOUSE INC: $125,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesTREE OF LIFE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesKieve Wavus Education Inc: $24,000 · Human ServicesDOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesAROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM: $8,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$938,000Environment$345,000Education$318,000Food & Nutrition$267,000Animals$166,000Health$126,000Human Services$90,500Crime & Legal$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIRST FRUITS FARM INC: $267,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $222,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP BALTIMORE INC: $191,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetB'MORE CLUBHOUSE INC: $125,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetHEALTHY PENINSULA: $95,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetBALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $83,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $75,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $73,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $62,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMIDATLANTIC HORSE RESCUE INC: $59,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC: $40,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC: $25,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTREE OF LIFE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKieve Wavus Education Inc: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA AMBULANCE CORPS: $11,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOREVER MARYLAND INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIPP BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds B'MORE CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDATLANTIC HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSE OF SHARON EQUESTRIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TREE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Kieve Wavus Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA AMBULANCE CORPS ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · James S and Gail P Riepe Charitable Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Thomas F & Clementine L Mullan Foundation Inc · Thomas Wilson Sanitarium for Children of Baltimore City · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Clayton Baker Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • First Fruits Farm Inc: 26% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brown Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Brown Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brown Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph