Skip to content
Broome County Community Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Broome County Community Charities Inc

To raise funds to promote artistic, medical and other charitable functions.

$587k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.0MPhilanthropy$648kHuman Services$438kYouth Development$207kEducation$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kArts & Culture$27kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $336,450, the rows itemized in this filing. The $587,007 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $250,557 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$18,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICAN$75,000
UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FD$50,200
LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$45,000
SECURITY MUTUAL CHARITABLE TRUST$30,000
HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD$30,000
WEST CORNERS LIONS CLUB$21,000
CHARLES F JOHNSON PTA$18,000
KEN DUKE AND FRIENDS$15,000
NRF FOUNDATION$15,000
BINGHAMTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$11,000
BU FOUNDATION$10,000
VESTAL ELKS CLUB$10,000
ABRAHAM HOUSE$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $30k → 16%HOP ON A CURE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $30k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $18k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $15k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $15k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$2.4M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+45%

Still filing today

83%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $500k · revenue +319%
  • UH
    UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $392k · revenue +129%
  • IC
    INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $297k · revenue +279%

Funded once

  • I
    ICAN
    one grant, 2022 · $54k
  • CM
    CAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue -71%
  • UV
    UNION VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SQUAD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany General Hospital Foundation

The foundation's specific purpose is to solicit, receive, and maintain gifts of money and property, and to make decisions on the distributions of such money and property, to support albany general hospital and health svcs in the general…

Health
2
State University of New York At Oneonta Foundation Corporation

To support and strengthen the fundraising programs of the state university of new york at oneonta so that gifts and grants are raised for student scholarships, faculty/student research, lectureships, and numerous academic and institutional…

—
3
Breast Cancer Network of Western New Yorkinc

Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.

Health
4
The Brooklyn Hospital Foundation Inc

The foundation exists to support the vision and mission of the brooklyn hospital center (tbhc) through a charitable organization committed to the brooklyn community. the primary purpose and scope of the foundation is to support a broad…

—
5
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
6
Oswego Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the Oswego Health Foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic support for Oswego Health and its not for profit entities as they provide accessible, quality care and improve the health of the residents in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation Inc

The jim and juli boeheim foundation strives to enrich the lives of kids in need within our central new york community, as well as, provide suport for eliminating cancer through research and advocacy.

Human Services
8
University At Buffalo Surgeons Inc

University at buffalo surgeons, inc., is a large team of surgeons dedicated to the improvement of the health of our patients, cutting edge research, and the professional development of our students and residents. we are committed to…

Education
9
Foundation of New York State Nurses Inc

The center for nursing at the foundation of new york state nurses promotes nursing leadership, research, and education to enhance the health and wellbeing of new yorkers through preservation of its history and advancement of the profession.

—
10
Als Association Upstate New York Chapter Inc

To lead the fight to cure and treat als through global, cutting edge research and patient care.

—
11
Westchester Medical Center Foundation

Support westchester county health care corporation (wchcc) by being responsive to the needs and objectives of the hospital and related facilities and programs operated by wchcc and the health and welfare of the communities served by such…

Health
12
Syracuse Health Science Center Medical Alumni Foundation Inc

The medical alumni foundation's purpose is to support the goals of the state university of new york upstate medical university and the alan and marlene norton college of medicine, to enhance excellence of the educational environment and to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Health Services Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $391,700 · HealthUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INCOUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $265,250 · HealthOUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL I…LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · HealthLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $88,000 · HealthCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH …CAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $36,000 · Health+2 more: $22,149 · HealthINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC: $297,000 · OtherINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES…WEST CORNERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $147,966 · OtherWEST CORNERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO…Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks: $88,615 · OtherBenevolent & Protective Order of …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BINGHAMTON: $63,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BINGHAMTO…UNION ENDICOTT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $54,000 · OtherUNION ENDICOTT CENTRAL SCHOOL DIS…ICAN: $54,000 · OtherICAN+7 more: $69,670 · Other+7 moreDICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyDICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUN…SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUNDATION: $98,000 · PhilanthropySECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUND…+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $122,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT HOUSE INC: $13,750 · Human ServicesHOP ON A CURE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $48,500 · EducationSUNY IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationBucknell University: $5,000 · EducationSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentDiscovery Center of the So Tier Inc: $27,250 · Arts & Culture
Health$893,099Other$774,251Philanthropy$613,000Human Services$150,750Education$68,500Youth Development$55,000Arts & Culture$27,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $391,700 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC: $297,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $265,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $122,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUNDATION: $98,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBenevolent & Protective Order of Elks: $88,615 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $88,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BINGHAMTON: $63,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $48,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $36,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetDiscovery Center of the So Tier Inc: $27,250 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNION VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $17,149 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKEN DUKE AND FRIENDS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNY IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCOMFORT HOUSE INC: $13,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOP ON A CURE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Shamrock Six Foundati…Dr G Clifford & Flore…The Tsb Foundation IncGe Aerospace Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
The Community Foundation for South Central New York IncNY17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Shamrock Six Foundation Inc · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Broome County Community Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Broome County Community Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Broome County Community Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home