· Public charity
Broome County Community Charities Inc
To raise funds to promote artistic, medical and other charitable functions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $336,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $587,007 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $250,557 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $205k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICAN | $75,000 |
| UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FD | $50,200 |
| LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| SECURITY MUTUAL CHARITABLE TRUST | $30,000 |
| HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPARD | $30,000 |
| WEST CORNERS LIONS CLUB | $21,000 |
| CHARLES F JOHNSON PTA | $18,000 |
| KEN DUKE AND FRIENDS | $15,000 |
| NRF FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BINGHAMTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $11,000 |
| VESTAL ELKS CLUB | $10,000 |
| BU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ABRAHAM HOUSE | $6,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DSDICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2022 · $500k · revenue +319%
- UHUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $392k · revenue +129%
- ICINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC5× · 2017–2024 · $297k · revenue +279%
Funded once
- IICANone grant, 2022 · $54k
- CMCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue -71%
- UVUNION VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SQUAD INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation's specific purpose is to solicit, receive, and maintain gifts of money and property, and to make decisions on the distributions of such money and property, to support albany general hospital and health svcs in the general…
To support and strengthen the fundraising programs of the state university of new york at oneonta so that gifts and grants are raised for student scholarships, faculty/student research, lectureships, and numerous academic and institutional…
Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.
The foundation exists to support the vision and mission of the brooklyn hospital center (tbhc) through a charitable organization committed to the brooklyn community. the primary purpose and scope of the foundation is to support a broad…
To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.
The mission of the Oswego Health Foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic support for Oswego Health and its not for profit entities as they provide accessible, quality care and improve the health of the residents in our community.
The jim and juli boeheim foundation strives to enrich the lives of kids in need within our central new york community, as well as, provide suport for eliminating cancer through research and advocacy.
University at buffalo surgeons, inc., is a large team of surgeons dedicated to the improvement of the health of our patients, cutting edge research, and the professional development of our students and residents. we are committed to…
The center for nursing at the foundation of new york state nurses promotes nursing leadership, research, and education to enhance the health and wellbeing of new yorkers through preservation of its history and advancement of the profession.
To lead the fight to cure and treat als through global, cutting edge research and patient care.
Support westchester county health care corporation (wchcc) by being responsive to the needs and objectives of the hospital and related facilities and programs operated by wchcc and the health and welfare of the communities served by such…
The medical alumni foundation's purpose is to support the goals of the state university of new york upstate medical university and the alan and marlene norton college of medicine, to enhance excellence of the educational environment and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Health Services Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DICK'S SPORTING GOODS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD ↗
- Who funds SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks ↗
- Who funds CAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BINGHAMTON ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
- Who funds CAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Discovery Center of the So Tier Inc ↗
- Who funds UNION VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds SUNY IMPACT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds KEN DUKE AND FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds COMFORT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOP ON A CURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENDICOTT ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Shamrock Six Foundation Inc · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Broome County Community Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.