Skip to content

· Public charity

Broken Wing Foundation

To provide timely assistance interim resources and encouragement ot those experiencing adversity

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$192kReligion$75kHealth$20kHousing & Shelter$18kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $45,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $213,387 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $168,387 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIssion St Joan of Arc$30,000
Vagabond Missions$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMIGOS DE JESUS: $5k → 7%Dreuding Center: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 4 repeat orgs$247k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$67k
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VAGABOND MISSIONS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +24%
  • TC
    THE CRANALEITH SPIRITUAL CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $17k · revenue +30%
  • TM
    THE MISSION OF ST JOAN OF ARC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $16k

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARTIN OF TOURS
    one grant, 2020 · $163k
  • BS
    BLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +311% · 47% of their budget
  • DC
    DRUEDING CENTER
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Birthmother Bridge Ministries
—
2
Women for Life of Winchester Inc

Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.

—
3
Brookshire New Birth Ministries

To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction

Human Services
4
Five Stones of Mary Foundation Inc
Religion
5
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
6
Father Michael J Mcgivney Center of Hope and Healing

Providing services for expecting mothers and their babies.

Human Services
7
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
8
Zoe for Life

Zoe for life! is a christian ministry which affirms the value of all life by providing nonjudgemental, confidential support and education during and after an unplanned pregnancy.

Human Services
9
Give Life Ny
Health
10
A Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center

A Beacon of Light is a life-affirming organization based on Catholic spirituality called to support families facing an unplanned pregnancy or any pregnancy loss, including abortion.

Civil Rights
11
Pregnancy Life Center

Protect life of the unborn and provide housing and life skills for homeless pregnant women and mothers with new babies that are accepted into our maternaty home program

Human Services
12
From Pain to Purpose

Helping those in pain and crisis.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessed Sarnelli Communityinc; the most unlike its peers is Legacy of Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARTIN OF TOURS: $163,333 · OtherST MARTIN OF TOURSHOLY INNOCENTS PARISH SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS PARISH SCHOOLTHE MISSION OF ST JOAN OF ARC: $15,500 · OtherTHE MISSION OF ST JOAN OF ARCTHE STARTING POINT INC OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $10,962 · OtherVAGABOND MISSIONS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentVAGABOND …BLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINC: $17,857 · Housing & ShelterTHE CRANALEITH SPIRITUAL CENTER: $16,500 · PhilanthropyDRUEDING CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmigos de Jesus: $5,000 · Human ServicesMichael P Donatucci Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Health
Other$229,795Youth Development$25,000Housing & Shelter$17,857Philanthropy$16,500Human Services$15,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVAGABOND MISSIONS: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINC: $17,857 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHE CRANALEITH SPIRITUAL CENTER: $16,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDRUEDING CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STARTING POINT INC OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAmigos de Jesus: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connelly FoundationPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Broken Wing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Broken Wing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Broken Wing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Broken Wing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Broken Wing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph