Skip to content
Brockschmidt Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Brockschmidt Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$363k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$209kHealth$124kAnimals$61kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kCrime & Legal$41kCommunity Improvement$17k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$27,162
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ARC OF THE OZARKS$82,162
YMCA$52,162
FOSTERADOPT CONNECT$40,762
SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING$31,162
FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST$27,162
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$27,162
RESCUE ONE$24,162
SOUTHWEST CENTER OF INDEPENDENT$22,162
GREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER$22,162
SPRINGFIELD ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION$17,162
GREAT SOUTHERN BANK$17,162
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $27k → 14%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $41k → 16%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $19k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $19k → 14%GREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CTR ALLIANC: $19k → 15%SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $31k → 15%FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST: $27k → 15%FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST: $19k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 5 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$298k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+46%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ARC OF THE OZARKS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $102k · revenue +10%
  • FC
    FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +0%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2024–2025 · $46k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • GC
    GREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $19k · revenue +46% · 36% of their budget
  • SC
    SW CTR OF INDEP LVG DBA EMPOWER ABILITIE
    one grant, 2024 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Area Agency On Aging Region X

Enable Missourians in Jasper, Newton, McDonald, and Barton counties to remain in their homes as long as possible and enhance their quality of life through social and nutritional services.

Human Services
2
Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging

Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.

Human Services
3
Greyhound Companions of Missouri

Rescue retired greyhounds and place in homes

—
4
Mid Missouri Malamute Rescue
Animals
5
Missouri Alliance for Animals

The mission of the missouri alliance for animals is to protect animals from abuse, neglect and inhumane treatment and to promote the welfare of animals through advocacy, education, research and investigations, promotion of humane public…

Animals
6
Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation

The missouri alliance for animal legislation is a non-profit organization lobbying full time to bring positive change for animals through the legislative process. our efforts are combined with the actions of concerned individuals, other…

—
7
Linkability Inc

Provide Case Management for people with developmental disabilities such as autism services, respite care, crisis intervention, self directed services, and Medicaid Home and Cummunity Based Waiver programs.

Human Services
8
The Arc of Southeast Iowa

Provide services to people with disabilities in the local area.

—
9
The Arc of Aurora

The arc provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons wih developmental disabilities.

—
10
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
11
Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Protect and rescue abandoned and at-risk animals.

Animals
12
Stray Paws Rescue

Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fosteradopt Connect Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rescue One. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARC OF THE OZARKS: $101,788 · OtherARC OF THE OZARKSYMCA: $52,162 · OtherYMCAGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $22,162 · OtherGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERSOUTHWEST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $22,162 · OtherSOUTHWEST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGSW CTR OF INDEP LVG DBA EMPOWER ABILITIE: $19,300 · OtherSW CTR OF INDEP LVG DBA EMPOWER ABILITIEGREAT SOUTHERN BANK: $17,162 · OtherGREAT SOUTHERN BANKFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $60,062 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $46,462 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent …FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST: $46,462 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRSTSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $31,162 · Human ServicesSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGINGGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCE: $19,300 · Human ServicesGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCERescue One: $43,462 · AnimalsRescue OneSPRINGFIELD ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $17,162 · AnimalsSPRINGFIELD A…
Other$234,736Human Services$203,448Animals$60,624

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARC OF THE OZARKS: $101,788 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $60,062 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $46,462 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST: $46,462 over 2y, 51% of budgetRescue One: $43,462 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $31,162 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $22,162 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCE: $19,300 over 1y, 36% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Musgrave FoundationThe Charlie & Mary Be…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brockschmidt Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brockschmidt Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brockschmidt Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home