· Private foundation
Brockschmidt Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ARC OF THE OZARKS | $82,162 |
| YMCA | $52,162 |
| FOSTERADOPT CONNECT | $40,762 |
| SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $31,162 |
| FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST | $27,162 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $27,162 |
| RESCUE ONE | $24,162 |
| SOUTHWEST CENTER OF INDEPENDENT | $22,162 |
| GREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER | $22,162 |
| GREAT SOUTHERN BANK | $17,162 |
| SPRINGFIELD ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION | $17,162 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOARC OF THE OZARKS2× · 2024–2025 · $102k · revenue +10%
- FCFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue 0%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches2× · 2024–2025 · $46k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- GCGREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $19k · revenue +46% · 36% of their budget
- SCSW CTR OF INDEP LVG DBA EMPOWER ABILITIEone grant, 2024 · $19k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enable Missourians in Jasper, Newton, McDonald, and Barton counties to remain in their homes as long as possible and enhance their quality of life through social and nutritional services.
Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.
Rescue retired greyhounds and place in homes
The mission of the missouri alliance for animals is to protect animals from abuse, neglect and inhumane treatment and to promote the welfare of animals through advocacy, education, research and investigations, promotion of humane public…
The missouri alliance for animal legislation is a non-profit organization lobbying full time to bring positive change for animals through the legislative process. our efforts are combined with the actions of concerned individuals, other…
Provide Case Management for people with developmental disabilities such as autism services, respite care, crisis intervention, self directed services, and Medicaid Home and Cummunity Based Waiver programs.
Provide services to people with disabilities in the local area.
The arc provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons wih developmental disabilities.
The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…
Protect and rescue abandoned and at-risk animals.
Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fosteradopt Connect Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rescue One. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARC OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ABILITIES FIRST ↗
- Who funds Rescue One ↗
- Who funds SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brockschmidt Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.