Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brittenham Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$50kEducation$46kArts & Culture$28kHuman Services$17kReligion$13kPublic Benefit$2kEnvironment$500Science & Tech$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Brittenham Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 58%.

Brittenham Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 6 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$115k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BALLET ARTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $21k · revenue +112%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +19%
  • AC
    Angel Charity for Children Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • BO
    BASIS ORO VALLEY PRIMARY
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
2
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
3
Az Opera Company

To nurture, promote and produce the finest traditional performances

—
4
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
5
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
6
Aclu Foundation of Arizona

The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.

Civil Rights
7
The Dons of Arizona
Education
8
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
9
Tucson Symphony Society

The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.

Arts & Culture
10
Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block Inc

The tucson museum of art and historic block connects art to life through meaningful and engaging experiences that inspire discovery, spark creativity, and promote cultural understanding.

Arts & Culture
11
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
12
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fraternal Order of Police Pima Lodge 20. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENT: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $12,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONABASIS ORO VALLEY PRIMARY: $6,000 · OtherBASIS ORO VALLEY PRIMARYSAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLE: $5,000 · OtherSAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLEST THOMAS THE APOSTLE ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH PHOENIX: $5,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH PHOENIXEMERGE CENTER FOR DOMESTIC ABUSE: $3,000 · Other+14 more: $7,385 · Other+14 moreUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $16,505 · EducationUniversity of Arizo…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRA…BASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $1,052 · EducationBALLET ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,750 · Arts & CultureBALLET ARTS FOUNDAT…TUCSON DESERT SONG FESTIVAL: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTUCSON DESERT SONG …The Rogue Theatre: $2,000 · Arts & CultureThe Rogue TheatreArizona Theatre Company: $1,000 · Arts & CultureAngel Charity for Children Inc: $13,250 · Human ServicesAngel Cha…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $100 · Public Benefit
Other$89,135Education$27,557Arts & Culture$26,250Human Services$13,250Public Benefit$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBALLET ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,750 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $16,505 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc: $13,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $1,052 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Early Music Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPATRONATO SAN XAVIER: $415 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PIMA LODGE 20: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BALLET ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Angel Charity for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON DESERT SONG FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds The Rogue Theatre ↗
  • Who funds BASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Early Music Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds PATRONATO SAN XAVIER ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PIMA LODGE 20 ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · AWH FOUNDATION co ROBERT W GILLETT · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brittenham Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brittenham Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brittenham Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph