Skip to content

· Private foundation

Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$470k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.6MYouth Development$1.5MEducation$1.4MInternational$600kCivil Rights$560kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kRecreation & Sports$38kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $467k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATIONS IN EDUCATION INC$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION - DYNASTY FUND$166,666
BUILDON$100,000
23 WEST LLC - BOBBY KANE MEMORIAL FUND$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AUSTISM PROJECT OF PALMBEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 12 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$5.5M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+38%

Still filing today

33%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +60%
  • FI
    Foundations in Education Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $610k · revenue +51%
  • BUILDON INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $550k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • O2
    ONE 2 ONE USA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
2
The Connecticut Community Foundation

To foster an equitable and inclusive community in greater waterbury and litchfield hills by inspiring generosity, supporting organizations, and cultivating effective leaders. the foundation works to address the community's critical issues,…

Philanthropy
3
Providence College

See schedule oprovidence college is a catholic, dominican, liberal arts institution of higher education and a community committed to academic excellence.

Education
4
Bridgeport Hospital Foundation Inc

To support bridgeport hospital by, in large part, fundraising, and further, to fund and promote activities of the yale new haven health system, the integrated health care delivery system of which it is a part.

Health
5
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
6
Stonehill College Inc

Stonehill college, a catholic institution of higher learning founded and guided by the congregation of holy cross, is a community of scholarship and faith, committed to fostering a culture where differences are affirmed and anchored by a…

Education
7
Cardinal Stritch University Inc

Cardinal stritch university is a comprehensive, coeducational, institution offering educational programs leading to associate, baccalaureate, masters and doctoral degrees in a variety of disciplines provided through its three colleges:…

Education
8
Foundations in Faith Inc

Support catholic education, vocation, and seminary education, priests' residence and retirement fund and diocesan ministries and programs.

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Catholic Health Initiatives National Foundation

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
11
St Catherine Center for Special Needs Inc

The mission of the center is as follows:(a) to operate, oversee, administer, manage and supervise the assets and activities of saint catherine center for special needs, inc. and, including but not limited to, the assets and activities of…

—
12
Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford

Mission: reflecting god's love, we partner with all to strengthen families and inspire people to achieve their fullest potential.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CATHERINE CENTER: $1,050,000 · OtherST CATHERINE CENTERBLEEDING BLUE FOR GOOD: $560,000 · OtherBLEEDING BLUE FOR GOODFoundations in Charity Inc: $300,000 · OtherFoundations in Charity IncCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $110,000 · OtherCATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $110,000 · Other+21 more: $286,000 · Other+21 moreCARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC: $1,500,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $691,666 · EducationTHE UNIVERSIT…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationFoundations in Education Inc: $610,000 · PhilanthropyFoundations…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBUILDON INC: $550,000 · InternationalBUILDON IN…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 · Human ServicesAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$2,416,000Youth Development$1,500,000Education$693,666Philanthropy$611,000International$555,000Human Services$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $691,666 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc: $610,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $550,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFoundations in Charity Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundations in Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundations in Charity Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC) ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John and Ethel Kashulon FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John and Ethel Kashulon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph