Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$470k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$1.6MYouth Development$1.5MEducation$1.4MInternational$600kCivil Rights$560kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kRecreation & Sports$38kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $467k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATIONS IN EDUCATION INC$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION - DYNASTY FUND$166,666
BUILDON$100,000
23 WEST LLC - BOBBY KANE MEMORIAL FUND$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AUSTISM PROJECT OF PALMBEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 12 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$5.5M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+38%

Still filing today

33%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +60%
  • FI
    Foundations in Education Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $610k · revenue +51%
  • BUILDON INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $550k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • O2
    ONE 2 ONE USA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
2
The Connecticut Community Foundation

To foster an equitable and inclusive community in greater waterbury and litchfield hills by inspiring generosity, supporting organizations, and cultivating effective leaders. the foundation works to address the community's critical issues,…

Philanthropy
3
Providence College

See schedule oprovidence college is a catholic, dominican, liberal arts institution of higher education and a community committed to academic excellence.

Education
4
Bridgeport Hospital Foundation Inc

To support bridgeport hospital by, in large part, fundraising, and further, to fund and promote activities of the yale new haven health system, the integrated health care delivery system of which it is a part.

Health
5
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
6
Stonehill College Inc

Stonehill college, a catholic institution of higher learning founded and guided by the congregation of holy cross, is a community of scholarship and faith, committed to fostering a culture where differences are affirmed and anchored by a…

Education
7
Cardinal Stritch University Inc

Cardinal stritch university is a comprehensive, coeducational, institution offering educational programs leading to associate, baccalaureate, masters and doctoral degrees in a variety of disciplines provided through its three colleges:…

Education
8
Foundations in Faith Inc

Support catholic education, vocation, and seminary education, priests' residence and retirement fund and diocesan ministries and programs.

9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Catholic Health Initiatives National Foundation

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
11
St Catherine Center for Special Needs Inc

The mission of the center is as follows:(a) to operate, oversee, administer, manage and supervise the assets and activities of saint catherine center for special needs, inc. and, including but not limited to, the assets and activities of…

12
Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford

Mission: reflecting god's love, we partner with all to strengthen families and inspire people to achieve their fullest potential.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CATHERINE CENTER — $1,050,000 · OtherST CATHERINE CENTERBLEEDING BLUE FOR GOOD — $560,000 · OtherBLEEDING BLUE FOR GOODFoundations in Charity Inc — $300,000 · OtherFoundations in Charity IncCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $110,000 · OtherCATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC — $110,000 · Other+21 more — $286,000 · Other+21 moreCARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC — $1,500,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $691,666 · EducationTHE UNIVERSIT…+1 more — $2,000 · EducationFoundations in Education Inc — $610,000 · PhilanthropyFoundations…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBUILDON INC — $550,000 · InternationalBUILDON IN…+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 · Human ServicesAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$2,416,000Youth Development$1,500,000Education$693,666Philanthropy$611,000International$555,000Human Services$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $691,666 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc — $610,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBUILDON INC — $550,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFoundations in Charity Inc — $300,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC) — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARHAR PHILANTHROPIES INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Foundations in Education Inc
  • Who funds BUILDON INC
  • Who funds Foundations in Charity Inc
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds ENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC)
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John and Ethel Kashulon FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John and Ethel Kashulon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Britta & Denis J Nayden Charitable Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph