Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brigham Family Foundation Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$162kHealth$40kHuman Services$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$285k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD'S HOUSE OF INDIANA$10,000
HOME FOR FRIENDLESS ANIMALS$6,000
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR HAMILTON COUNTY$6,000
SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
HICKORY LEVEL HOUND RESCUE$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296k · 13 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$296k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+56%

Still filing today

54%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +95%
  • RS
    ROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +3%
  • HS
    Humane Society for Hamilton County
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BUREAU INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Raskels Rescue
Animals
3
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
4
Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter

Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter is dedicated to providing shelter, care, medical support, and adoption services for stray, surrendered, and homeless dogs and other animals in Franklin County, Indiana. The organization…

Animals
5
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
6
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
7
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
8
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
9
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
10
Flagler Humane Society Inc

We transform the lives of animals with compassionate care and services, outstanding educational programs, and advocacy for all animals.

Animals
11
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
12
Humane Society of Clinton County Inc

To provide for the humane treatment of animals in clinton county, indiana

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosie's Southside Animal Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Bureau Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $40,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL INDIANA INCRONALD MCDONALD'S HOUSE OF INDIANA: $30,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD'S HOUSE OF INDIANAHUMANE SOCIETY FOR: $29,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY FORAMERICAN RED CROSS: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHICKORY LEVEL HOUND RESCUE: $14,000 · OtherHICKORY LEVEL HOUND RESCUEAMERICAN RED CROSS OF: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OFHOME FOR FRIENDLESS ANIMALS INC: $42,000 · AnimalsHOME FOR FRIENDLESS ANIMALS INCROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $35,000 · AnimalsROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INCHumane Society for Hamilton County: $18,000 · AnimalsHumane Society for Hamilton CountyBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $8,500 · AnimalsIndianapolis Zoological Society IncWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$168,000Animals$118,500Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME FOR FRIENDLESS ANIMALS INC: $42,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOME FOR FRIENDLESS ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society for Hamilton County ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samerian Foundation IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samerian Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brigham Family Foundation Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brigham Family Foundation Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brigham Family Foundation Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph