Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$353k
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$346kHuman Services$318kYouth Development$287kEducation$193kCrime & Legal$110kPhilanthropy$101kHousing & Shelter$83kAnimals$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k59 grants · $223k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS OF THE LC VALLEY$50,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$10,000
YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON$10,000
LC VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
IDAHO LAW FOUNDATION$10,000
VARIOUS$6,025
LEWISTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
NW CHILDREN'S HOME$5,000
GONZAGA LAW IMMIGRATION CLINIC$5,000
A SOLDIERS CHILD$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $2k → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $2k → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $2k → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $515 → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $500 → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%PARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $200 → 13%A SOLDIERS CHILD: $3k → 9%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $10k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $10k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $10k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $10k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%HOMES OF HOPE: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTONCLARKSTON: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 62 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 56 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
13

Total granted

$1.8M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+60%

Still filing today

52%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +106%
  • IL
    Idaho Law Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +100%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • L
    LHS
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • VM
    VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc
Health
4
Idaho Veterans Network Corporation

Idaho Veterans Network is a group who advocates, shares information, solves problems for veterans and their families in crisis, and supports each other. This is a place of trust. We are strictly a non-profit volunteer organization with a…

Public Benefit
5
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
6
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
7
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
8
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
9
Volunteer Hospice of Clallam County

Volunteer Hospice of Clallam County's (VHOCC) mission is to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support to terminally ill patients and their families with free around the clock registered nursing availability and trained volunteers.…

Health
10
Hospice of North Idaho Inc

"With open hearts and expertise, we serve the seriously ill and those touched by loss." Our grief and loss program is provided to patients' loved ones, but is also available to other members of our community. Palliative services are…

—
11
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
12
Illinois Valley Animal Rescue

llinois Valley Animal Rescue's mission is to rescue, provide care and comfort for abused, neglected and homeless animals in the Illinois Valley Area through a care center, foster homes and veterinarian sources. To promote responsible pet…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Modie Park Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS OF THE LC VALLEY: $250,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS OF THE LC VALLEYVARIOUS: $103,560 · OtherVARIOUSIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLHS: $75,000 · OtherLHSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $75,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESIdaho Law Foundation Inc: $70,000 · OtherLC VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $60,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherLEWIS-CLARK STATE COLLEGE: $58,000 · OtherLCSC FOUNDATION: $57,500 · Other+45 more: $456,350 · Other+45 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $90,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…Craig Hospital Foundation: $30,000 · HealthCraig Hospital Fo…GINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $28,145 · HealthGINA QUESENBERRY …ROAD 2 RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthROAD 2 RECOVERY F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $24,090 · HealthSNAKE RIVER COMMU…WILLOW CENTER INC: $21,000 · HealthWILLOW CENTER INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEA…American Heart Association Inc: $17,945 · HealthAmerican Heart As…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $12,075 · Health+2 more: $6,100 · HealthYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC: $52,000 · Human ServicesA SOLDIERS CHILD INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $23,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $13,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $7,215 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,200 · PhilanthropyLILI GC FOUNDATION CORP: $17,500 · PhilanthropyFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,150 · EducationASOTIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationLEWISTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationFreedom Youth Foundation Inc: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationLEWIS CLARK ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $27,000 · AnimalsANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 · AnimalsIDAHO ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK: $2,500 · AnimalsRILOS RESCUE INC: $2,500 · AnimalsNEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $32,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,345,410Health$299,355Human Services$127,715Philanthropy$47,700Education$43,650Animals$40,500Public Benefit$32,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Law Foundation Inc: $70,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC: $52,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $32,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $28,145 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetLEWIS CLARK ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetROAD 2 RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA SOLDIERS CHILD INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $24,090 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW CENTER INC: $21,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetMODIE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,945 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLILI GC FOUNDATION CORP: $17,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetLC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $16,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $16,210 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPalouse Discovery Science Center Inc: $12,514 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $12,075 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUPRIVER YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetINTERLINK INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $7,215 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEWISTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetVALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEL YOUR BOOBIES FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetChildren's Cancer Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Law Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS CLARK ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROAD 2 RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds A SOLDIERS CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MODIE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LILI GC FOUNDATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds LC VALLEY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Deatley Family FoundationID30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Deatley Family Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Twin County United Way Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Round Room Gives Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Potlatch No1 Financial Credit Union · The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 93%
  • Partnerships in Community Living Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brien & Shelly Deatley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph