· Public charity
Potlatch No1 Financial Credit Union
P1fcu is committed to financial well-being for all and community enrichment in the pacific northwest.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $773,874 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,111,891 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $338,017 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $137k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $584k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LCSC FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| LEWISTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 | $135,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY | $131,750 |
| TRISTATE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $66,750 |
| WALLA WALLA COUNTY | $50,000 |
| ASOTIN COUNTY FAIR LIVESTOCK SALE | $29,825 |
| TWIN COUNTY UNITED WAY | $23,437 |
| ASOTIN COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT | $22,012 |
| GINA QUESENBERRY FOUNDATION | $18,073 |
| INTEGRITY DESIGN COPYWORKS LLC | $16,639 |
| FRONTIER DAYS FOUNDATION | $15,492 |
| GOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION | $11,258 |
| VALLEY VISION | $9,166 |
| BOISE PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL | $9,000 |
| LEWIS CLARK ANIMAL SHELTER | $7,917 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC5× · 2019–2024 · $516k · revenue +101%
- GFGOWEST FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +937%
- TCTWIN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $86k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- LLLEWISTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -87%
- UWUNITED WAY OF WHITMAN COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +5%
- MSMUSTANG SIGNSone grant, 2021 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.
Food is collected through donations and purchases, then distributed on an as needed basis.
Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region
To build an abundant, resilient, and valued local food system that supports our landscape, our farmers, ranchers, and food artisans, and our community.
Fundraising for member agencies
Preservation of history in Whitman County
To provide food for local community families.
Preservation of community forests, supporting education and community utilization of community lands in the Chewelah Valley.
Museum
The Spokane River Forums mission is to create materials, events and activities that promote regional dialogues for sustaining a healthy river system while meeting the needs of a growing population.
Provide food to local needy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Twin County United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Valley Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DBA TRISTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds LEWISTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds LEWIS CLARK ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds GINA QUESENBERRY BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Frontier Days Foundation ↗
- Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Latah County 4H and FFA Market Animal Sale Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WHITMAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KOOTENAI COUNTY IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH IDAHO FAIR & RODEO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Community Center ↗
- Who funds OROFINO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE dba CLEARWATER COUNTY CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACKSONS PAY IT FORWARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Deatley Family Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Hughes Foundation · Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Potlatch No1 Financial Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.