· Private foundation
Bridgewood Fieldwater Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k94 grants · $112k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENWAY INSTITUTE (GREENWAY COLLEGE) | $49,000 |
| RICHARD R GREEN HIGH SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION (IGPA) | $20,000 |
| VTDIGGER (VT JOURNALISM TRUST LTD) | $20,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| UNICEF | $9,000 |
| USA FOR UNHCR UN REFUGEE AGENCY | $8,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $8,000 |
| TREES NY INC | $7,000 |
| REGIONAL HOSPICE (DANBURY CT) | $5,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| CHURCH WORLD SERVICE | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | $4,000 |
| RVNA HEALTH | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
191 repeat relationships — 87 still active in FY2025, 104 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UVUPPER VALLEY HAVEN8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +107%
- TFTHE FAMILY PLACE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +29%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +36%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS IGPAone grant, 2019 · $5k
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations and the most unlike its peers is Kent Singers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 251 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OAKHILL ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds HUDSON VALLEY POLONAISE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR CARTOON STUDIES ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds RVNAHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · Global Impact · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc · The Kestrel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bridgewood Fieldwater Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- Connecticut Science Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
- Kent Singers Inc — 14% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art — 5% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resource a Nonprofit Community Enterprise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Rvnahealth Inc — 2% of income from government
- Addison County Home Health Hospice Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Danbury Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Energy Action Network Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bridgewood Fieldwater Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bridgewood Fieldwater Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.