Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bridge Builders Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$622k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$1.9MEnvironment$88kEducation$74kHuman Services$43kFood & Nutrition$30kInternational$20kEmployment$20kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$621,858
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bank of America Gift Fund Ned Kli$621,858
Schwab Charitable Fund Kristan Chil$621,858
Vanguard Charitable The Klingelho$621,858
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Rwanda Girls Initiative: $5k → 9%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $2k → 7%Rwanda Girls Initiative: $5k → 9%The Grapevine Family and Community Resource Center: $2k → 7%Rwanda Girls Initiative: $3k → 9%The Grapevine Family and Community Resource Center: $2k → 7%Rwanda Girls Intiative: $3k → 9%The Grapevine Family and Community Resource Center: $1k → 7%Peterborough Human Services Fund: $6k → 7%Peterborough Human Services Fund: $5k → 7%Peterborough Human Services Fund: $5k → 7%Peterborough Human Services Fund: $3k → 7%Sweetwater Spectrum: $4k → 9%Sweetwater Spectrum: $3k → 9%The River Center: $2k → 7%Sweetwater Spectrum: $3k → 9%The River Center: $2k → 7%Sweetwater Spectrum: $3k → 9%The River Center: $2k → 7%The River Center: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
RI
CA
CO
NE
MD
AZ
AR
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$287k · 33 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
29

Total granted

$287k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+20%

Still filing today

85%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    Urban Tilth
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +367%
  • BT
    Bridge the Gap College Prep
    4× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +109%
  • SS
    SUMMER SEARCH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR HAITI INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -15%
  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth's mission is to empower everyone, everywhere, with the knowledge, inspiration, and opportunity to heal the Earth and reclaim our future.

Environment
5
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
6
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
7
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
10
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
11
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
12
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy

The minnesota center for environmental advocacy is a nonprofit organization that uses law, science and research to protect minnesota's environment, its natural resources and the health of its people.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dublin Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Women & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,509

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
41/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Schwab Charitable Fund Kristan Chil — $621,858 · OtherSchwab Charitable Fund Kristan ChilVanguard Charitable The Klingelho — $621,858 · OtherVanguard Charitable The KlingelhoBank of America Gift Fund Ned Kli — $621,858 · OtherBank of America Gift Fund Ned Kli+28 more — $67,000 · OtherHARRIS CENTER FOR CONSERVATION EDUCATION INC — $37,500 · EnvironmentUrban Tilth — $26,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $8,000 · EnvironmentLandPaths — $8,000 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUST — $7,500 · Environment350ORG — $4,000 · Environment+10 more — $14,500 · EnvironmentPETERBOROUGH AREA COMMUNITY AID INC — $18,500 · Human ServicesRwanda Girls Initiative — $15,000 · Human ServicesSWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,000 · Human Services10000 DEGREES — $17,500 · EducationSun Valley Community School Inc — $7,500 · EducationCentro Laboral de Graton — $6,500 · EducationDUBLIN SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · EducationHAND IN HAND PARENTING — $4,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $2,000 · Education+3 more — $1,200 · EducationBridge the Gap College Prep — $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $200 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER SEARCH — $20,000 · EmploymentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,000 · InternationalHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $2,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $2,000 · International+1 more — $100 · International
Other$1,932,574Environment$105,500Human Services$58,500Education$43,700Youth Development$25,200Employment$20,000International$7,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARRIS CENTER FOR CONSERVATION EDUCATION INC — $37,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUrban Tilth — $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBridge the Gap College Prep — $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPETERBOROUGH AREA COMMUNITY AID INC — $18,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budget10000 DEGREES — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRwanda Girls Initiative — $15,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLandPaths — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSun Valley Community School Inc — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT TAMALPAIS SCHOOL — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDUBLIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTHE RIVER CENTER FAMILY & COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton — $6,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDUBLIN SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND PARENTING — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDUBLIN COMMUNITY CENTER — $3,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMONADNOCK AREA TRANSITIONAL SHELTER — $3,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBLACK HERITAGE TRAIL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350 BAY AREA — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFossil Free California — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONADNOCK CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMN350 — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDaily Acts Organization — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOccidental Arts and Ecology Center — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELVEDERE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE OUR MONARCHS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 1833 SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMULTIPLIER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Bay Organizing Project — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD GRIEF NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…New Hampshire Charita…Sonoma County Communi…The James Irvine Foun…East Bay Community Fo…The Kingsbury FundHidden Leaf FoundationMerrill Family Charit…The Memton Fund IncEversource Energy Fou…McNabb FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…
Marin Community FoundationCA27.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · Hidden Leaf Foundation · Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Memton Fund Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · McNabb Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bridge Builders Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bridge Builders Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bridge Builders Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines