· Private foundation
Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k52 grants · $226k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $318k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| MIRA COALITION | $65,000 |
| CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY INTERNATIONAL | $60,000 |
| CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE | $60,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| WBUR | $30,000 |
| COMPANY ONE INC | $27,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| FOS FEMINISTA | $15,000 |
| HARRIS CENTER FOR CONSERVATION | $15,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $15,000 |
| TUPELO PRESS INC | $15,000 |
| UNITED HELP UKRAINE | $15,000 |
| RAZOM INC | $15,000 |
| RED BULL THEATER INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $249k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $245k · revenue +80%
COMPANY ONE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +195%
BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- ABAMALGAMATED BANK AC OF FOODSHED CAPITALone grant, 2021 · $40k
- CCCAPE COD MODERN HOUSE TRUSTone grant, 2024 · $34k · revenue 0%
- GTGREATER THINGSone grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Worcester Free Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
153 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 153 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JAMES MERRILL HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPANY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
- Who funds CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Harvest International ↗
- Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
- Who funds TUPELO PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds FULLER CRAFT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL SQUARE THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT AGAINST VIOLENT ENCOUNTERS ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds CAPE COD MODERN HOUSE TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ON THE RISE INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for Public Affairs ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds DURHAM CRISIS RESPONSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Plummer Fdn-Cash · Alchemy Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · The Memton Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Barr Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lgbtq Senior Housing Inc — 100% of income from government
- Project Against Violent Encounters — 100% of income from government
- New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
- Project Right — 71% of income from government
- Bagly Inc — 39% of income from government
- On the Rise Inc — 39% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn — 28% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Transcultural Exchange — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Affordable Homeownership Foundation Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Actors' Shakespeare Project — 6% of income from government
- Student Clinic for Immigrant Justice Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Tupelo Press Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boston Lyric Opera Company — 3% of income from government
- Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Central Square Theater Inc — 2% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Company One Inc — 2% of income from government
- Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc — 2% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fuller Craft Museum Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Farm and Wilderness Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.