Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brezzo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$178kHousing & Shelter$159kEducation$103kPhilanthropy$93kFood & Nutrition$85kHuman Services$77kEnvironment$75kArts & Culture$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $52k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING$12,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$10,000
ROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$10,000
JW HOUSE$8,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH BRIGHT FOCUS FOUDNATION$5,000
GOOD KARMA BIKES$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,081
CRISTO REY DE LA SALLE EAST BAY HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL (BOYSCOUTS)$3,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,500
KQED$3,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD KARMA BIKES: $10k → 8%SHARED BLESSING: $1k → 17%GOOD KARMA BIKES: $8k → 8%GOOD KARMA BIKES: $5k → 8%GOOD KARMA BIKES: $5k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $25k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $20k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $12k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $10k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$864k · 28 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
18

Total granted

$864k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+22%

Still filing today

68%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +24%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +128%
  • JH
    JW HOUSE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Colorado Trail Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +22%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Land Trust of Santa Cruz County

Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…

Environment
5
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
6
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
9
The Commons Inc

To partner with individuals and organizations to access, organize, and share data that inspires action that restores our environment.

—
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
12
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trails 2000 Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sainte Claire Historic Preservation Foun. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY DE LA SALLE EAST BAY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $102,000 · OtherCRISTO REY DE LA SALLE EAST BAY HIGH SCHOOL INCROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION: $93,076 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATIONFIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING: $83,000 · OtherFIRST COMMUNITY HOUSINGTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $36,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH BRIGHT FOCUS FOUDNATION: $24,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $22,650 · OtherSILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL (BOYSCOUTS): $22,000 · OtherWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $21,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $21,000 · Other+22 more: $98,650 · Other+22 moreJW HOUSE: $46,600 · HealthJW HOUSEAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $24,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $19,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROS…CANCER CAREPOINT INC: $16,377 · HealthCANCER CAREPO…VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $5,000 · HealthFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $75,834 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPO…GOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesGOOD KARMA B…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $80,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HA…SAINTE CLAIRE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUN: $16,602 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $12,618 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $6,700 · Arts & CultureSAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,651 · International
Other$556,876Health$111,977Human Services$104,334Food & Nutrition$80,000Arts & Culture$40,920Youth Development$27,000International$22,651

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION: $93,076 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetFIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING: $83,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $75,834 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetJW HOUSE: $46,600 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $27,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $24,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,651 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $21,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $21,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $19,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSAINTE CLAIRE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUN: $16,602 over 4y, 22% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $16,377 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $12,618 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRAILS 2000 INC: $11,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetThe Colorado Trail Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $6,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds JW HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD KARMA BIKES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SAINTE CLAIRE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUN ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CAREPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds TRAILS 2000 INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Colorado Trail Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARED BLESSINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pursuit Of Excellence ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Hugh Stuart Center Charitable Trust · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA · The Kirkorian Family Foundation · Star One Credit Union · The Intuit Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brezzo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brezzo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brezzo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph