Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bresky Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$690k
Granted FY2022
48
Grants FY2022
12
States reached
$295k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$1.6MPhilanthropy$570kInternational$495kEducation$356kCommunity Improvement$303kHuman Services$295kCivil Rights$155kFood & Nutrition$120kOther$0
02FY2022 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k30 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $295k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND SPONSORING ORGANIZATION OF PATRICIA A BRESKY FUND$295,000
CORPORATE COMMITMENT FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT$100,000
HARVESTERS$30,000
GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD KS$20,000
MAYO CLINIC$20,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$15,000
CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITALS$15,000
KANSAS CITY HOSPICE & PALLATIVE CARE$15,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
CENTER FOR BIOETHICS$10,000
VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT$10,000
WATERORG$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($3.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($650k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $13k → 9%VOICES AND FACES PROJECT: $20k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 5%VOICES AND FACES PROJECT: $10k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 9%VOICES AND FACES PROJECT: $10k → 14%VOICES AND FACES PROJECT: $3k → 14%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $5k → 8%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $8k → 16%THE PRICE CENTER: $5k → 8%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $8k → 16%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $6k → 16%HIGH ASPIRATIONS: $1k → 15%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $15k → 16%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
TN
DC
AL
FL

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($650k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Congo (Kinshasa)$650k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Bresky Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bresky Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 55 repeat orgs$594k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2022, 37 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
19

Total granted

$3.5M
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+20%

Still filing today

60%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $386k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +224%
  • AL
    Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago
    5× · 2017–2021 · $165k · revenue +25%
  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    3× · 2020–2022 · $120k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY HOSPICE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • EP
    ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
6
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/64
Grantees still filing
52/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CCLD MEDICAL CENTER: $350,000 · OtherCCLD MEDICAL CENTERCORPORATE COMMITMENT FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT: $300,000 · OtherCORPORATE COMMITMENT FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENTSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND SPONSORING ORGANIZATION OF PATRICIA A BRESKY FUND: $295,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND SPONSORING ORGANIZATION OF PATRICIA A BRESK…Arvey Community Health AT Weiss Memorial Hospital: $225,000 · OtherArvey Community Health AT Weiss Memorial HospitalAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $165,000 · OtherAccess Living of Metropolitan ChicagoBELMONT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $120,000 · OtherHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $120,000 · Other+56 more: $1,044,000 · Other+56 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEA…MAYO CLINIC: $112,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $85,000 · HealthThe Children's Me…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $75,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALT…Children's Hospital Corporation: $55,000 · HealthChildren's Hospit…BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $32,500 · Health+4 more: $25,250 · HealthWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $115,000 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $85,000 · EducationICIVICS INC: $33,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $15,000 · Education+2 more: $5,500 · EducationGLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC: $50,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $42,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $40,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $39,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $35,000 · InternationalTHE ELIE WIESEL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC: $15,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $15,000 · InternationalWATERORG: $10,000 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $210,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $24,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DECIBELS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE VOICES & FACES PROJECT: $42,500 · Human ServicesROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $115,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $27,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $3,500 · Civil Rights
Other$2,619,000Health$674,750Education$283,500International$272,250Philanthropy$259,500Human Services$197,000Civil Rights$145,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $165,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $112,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $58,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOICES & FACES PROJECT: $42,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $42,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $39,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICIVICS INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELIE WIESEL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DECIBELS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATERORG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWECODE KC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WALKABOUT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wally Foundation IncKS34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wally Foundation Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Ina Calkins Trust · The Baum Family Foundation · The Curry Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bresky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bresky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Roxbury Stone House Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • William James College Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Austen Riggs Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bresky Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bresky Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bresky’s filings →

More from the funding graph