Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Breast Cancer Fund of Ohio

The BREAST CANCER FUND OF OHIO supports organizations throughout ohio that help women and men who are coping with the day-to-day challenges of living while being treated for breast cancer.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$262kPublic Safety & Disaster$168kHuman Services$91kFood & Nutrition$52k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $64,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $166,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $102,366 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINK RIBBON GIRLS$17,000
CANCER FAMILY CARE$12,000
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$7,500
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF CENTRAL$7,000
VICTORY CENTER IN TOLEDO$7,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC$7,000
LIFE CARE ALLIANCE$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $8k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMM OF GREATER CINC: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$510k · 11 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$510k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+29%

Still filing today

91%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +438%
  • CF
    Cancer Family Care Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +22%
  • LA
    LIFECARE ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC TAUSSIG CANCER CTR
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • RC
    ROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +78%
  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

2
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

3
Community Cancer Foundation

To assist, encourage, promote, and advance the best care, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons afflicted with cancer or related medical conditions.

Health
4
Cancer Support Community of Greater Ann Arbor

Csc uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

5
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program Inc

To reduce cancer incidence and mortality through improved treatment and prevention by offering national, state-of-the-art cancer research to local communities.

Health
6
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
7
Cancer Care Services

Cancer care services supports cancer patients, cares for caregivers, and empowers survivors to reduce the impact of cancer in tarrant county.

Health
8
Cancer Support Community Greater San Gabriel Valley

Cancer support community uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

9
Trinity Health System Group

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

10
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Physicians Care Connection

Physicians careconnection (pcc) mission is to optimize health for individuals experiencing healthcare challenges due to personal and systemic barriers.

12
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Support Community Central Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Jd Breast Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $106,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INCCancer Family Care Inc — $60,000 · HealthCancer Family Care IncATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $37,000 · HealthATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY CENTRAL OHIO — $35,500 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY CENTRAL OHIOTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,365 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION+5 more — $33,250 · Health+5 moreUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $67,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH …THE VICTORY CENTER — $42,000 · OtherTHE VICTORY CENTERGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON — $12,500 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - …CLEVELAND CLINIC TAUSSIG CANCER CTR — $8,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC TAUSSIG CAN…ROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $8,000 · OtherROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION…CANCER PATIENT SERVICES — $7,000 · OtherLIFECARE ALLIANCE — $52,000 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE A…CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $49,000 · Human ServicesCANCER SU…KAREN P NAKON BREAST CANCER FOUND — $23,500 · PhilanthropyBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $7,500 · Religion
Health$297,115Other$144,500Food & Nutrition$52,000Human Services$49,000Philanthropy$23,500Religion$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $106,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCancer Family Care Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE — $52,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $49,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE VICTORY CENTER — $42,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY CENTRAL OHIO — $35,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $25,365 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKAREN P NAKON BREAST CANCER FOUND — $23,500 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON — $12,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN OHIO MEDICAL CENTER — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER PATIENT SERVICES — $7,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJD BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetADENA HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johnson Charitable Gift FundOH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Breast Cancer Fund of Ohio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Breast Cancer Fund of Ohio?

    Find your warmest path to Breast Cancer Fund of Ohio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph