Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brandt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$105kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$17kRecreation & Sports$17kPhilanthropy$13kCrime & Legal$11kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northern Cass Community Health and Wellness$1,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$1,000
Dakota Medical Foundation$500
Roger Maris Cancer Center$500
Fraser Ltd$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%A01 Foundation Inc: $10k → 11%The Great North Pole: $4k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $80k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $20k → 12%The Outdoor Adventure Foundation: $1k → 12%YMCA of the Northern Sky: $700 → 12%Fraser LTD: $308 → 12%Fraser LTD: $305 → 12%FRASER LTD: $250 → 12%Fraser LTD: $250 → 12%Fraser LTD: $250 → 12%Fraser Ltd: $250 → 12%Fraser LTD: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$167k · 14 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$167k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-3%

Still filing today

64%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Hospice of the Red River Valley
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • RR
    Red River Childrens Advocacy Center
    5× · 2018–2022 · $11k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE THIELEN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -19%
  • MS
    Metro Sports Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -10%
  • AF
    AO1 FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

2
Missouri Valley Family Ymca

To put Christian principles into practices through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Keystone Community Services

To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.

5
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

6
Family Wellness Bismarck-Mandan Llc

Committed to improving the wellness of families.

Human Services
7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
8
Care Providers of Minnesota Foundation

To promote quality care in long term health care facilities through education and research.

9
Minnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance

The Minnesota Children's Alliance leads the development and growth of locally based children's advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to ensure equitable access to services for healing and growth.

Crime & Legal
10
Children's Advocacy Centers of North Carolina Inc

We are an accredited state chapter of the national children's alliance. as the statewide leader we develop, train and sustain high-quality children's advocacy centers and multi-disciplinary teams.

Crime & Legal
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Easter Seals Goodwill Nd Inc

Easter Seals Goodwill ND, Inc. is a leading organization in supporting children, adults, and families to have equal opportunities to live, learn, work, and play in their communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anne Carlsen Center and the most unlike its peers is Red River Valley Veterans Concert Band Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hospice of the Red River Valley — $100,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Red River ValleyAO1 FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesAO1 FOUNDATION INC+5 more — $8,063 · Human Services+5 moreUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $8,000 · OtherUnited Way of Cass-Cl…Fellowship of Christian Athletes — $5,500 · OtherFellowship of Christi…Feed My Starving Children — $5,000 · OtherFeed My Starving Chil…BADLANDS MINISTRIES — $5,000 · OtherBADLANDS MINISTRIESUnited Way Cass Clay — $3,000 · OtherUnited Way Cass ClayK9 Crew — $3,000 · OtherK9 CrewROGER MARIS CANCER CENTER — $1,500 · OtherUNITED WAY — $1,500 · OtherRED RIVER VALLEY VETERANS CONCERT BAND INC — $3,000 · OtherRED RIVER VALLEY VETE…Dakota Medical Foundation — $2,000 · OtherANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $1,500 · Other+5 more — $3,900 · Other+5 moreFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $20,000 · InternationalFEED MY S…THE THIELEN FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · PhilanthropyRed River Childrens Advocacy Center — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEGACY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentMetro Sports Foundation Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthern Cass Community Health & Wellness Center — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsYWCA CASS CLAY — $8,500 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$118,063Other$42,900International$20,000Philanthropy$14,000Youth Development$13,000Recreation & Sports$11,000Housing & Shelter$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHospice of the Red River Valley — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THIELEN FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRed River Childrens Advocacy Center — $11,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMetro Sports Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAO1 FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYWCA CASS CLAY — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Great North Pole — $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRED RIVER VALLEY VETERANS CONCERT BAND INC — $3,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRASER LTD — $1,863 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OUTDOOR ADVENTURE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of the Northern Sky — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MINOT — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring FoundationND30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Impact Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Otto Bremer Trust · Dakota Medical Charities · Fred M Hector Jr Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brandt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brandt Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brandt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph