Skip to content
Brandon and Ivette White Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Brandon and Ivette White Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$12kAnimals$5kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$2kCrime & Legal$2kYouth Development$766Community Improvement$682Philanthropy$585Other$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$162
Median grant
8
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOY'S LATIN SCHOOL$1,850
FOXCROFT SCHOOL$1,554
TALBOT HUMANE$1,030
SHE SENDS FOUNDATION$1,029
PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY$528
ST JAMES ACADEMY$516
SKULL GAMES$260
SEA HUGGER$213
SILICON VALLEY BIKE COALITION$162
THE SKATEPARK PROJECT$135
ADVENTURE SCIENTISTS$108
WASHINGTON COLLEGE$103
PACIFIC BEACH COALITION$103
CITY KIDS$103
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $528 → 7%LIVE IN PEACE INC: $258 → 8%BOUNDLESS JUNIOR AGILITY CO: $1k → 10%SHE SENDS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CITY KIDS: $205 → 14%SKULL GAMES: $1k → 10%UNC ALUMN LIFE MEMBER: $250 → 13%FOXCROFT SCHOOL: $2k → 4%TALBOT HUMANE: $2k → 10%ST JAMES ACADEMY: $516 → 11%WASHINGTON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%BOY'S LATIN: $2k → 19%PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $425 → 7%THE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $135 → 11%CITY KIDS: $200 → 14%SKULL GAMES: $260 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $200 → 13%FOXCROFT SCHOOL: $2k → 4%TALBOT HUMANE: $1k → 10%ST JAMES ACADEMY: $500 → 11%WASHINGTON COLLEGE: $250 → 12%BOY'S LATIN SCHOOL: $2k → 19%PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $422 → 7%CITY KIDS: $103 → 14%SKULL GAMES: $260 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $100 → 13%FOXCROFT SCHOOL: $2k → 4%TALBOT HUMANE: $1k → 10%ST JAMES ACADEMY: $500 → 11%WASHINGTON COLLEGE: $103 → 12%BOY'S LATIN: $2k → 19%SEA HUGGER: $267 → 7%CABRILLO ADULT SCHOOL: $259 → 7%COASTSIDE LAND TRUST: $250 → 7%SEA HUGGER: $213 → 7%ABUNDANT GRACE: $206 → 7%SEA HUGGER: $107 → 7%COASTSIDE LAND TRUST: $100 → 7%MAIN STREET SCHOLARS: $100 → 7%PACIFIC BEACH COALITION: $200 → 7%PACIFIC BEACH COALITION: $103 → 7%PACIFIC BEACH COALITION: $103 → 7%SYNAPSE SCHOOL: $258 → 7%COASTSIDE ON BIKES: $250 → 7%COASTSIDE ON BIKES: $250 → 7%COASTSIDE ON BIKES: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
OR
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 16 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$23k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-3%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentAnimalsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TALBOT HUMANE CO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +121%
  • WC
    WASHINGTON COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • SG
    SKULL GAMES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • BJ
    BOUNDLESS JUNIOR AGILITY CO
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • CA
    CABRILLO ADULT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $259
  • SS
    SYNAPSE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $258 · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
2
Girls in Stem
Human Services
3
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
4
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
5
The Salish Sea School

The salish sea schools mission is to awaken curiosity and deepen connections with the sea through shore and sea exploration programs for all ages.

Environment
6
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
7
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
8
Puget Sound Community School

Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…

—
9
Salish Sea Sciences

We fully exploit the physical and human resources of the Salish Sea to equip high school students with knowledge, skills, career awareness, and confidence for civic life and college and career success, most especially in STEAM fields.…

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
12
Pacific Northern Academy

To educate students to be exceptional learners and independent thinkers of vision, courage, and integrity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live in Peace; the most unlike its peers is St James Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $3,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JAMES ACADEMY INC: $1,516 · OtherST JAMES ACADEMY INCPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,375 · OtherPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETYBOUNDLESS JUNIOR AGILITY CO: $1,000 · OtherBOUNDLESS JUNIOR AGILITY COSILICON VALLEY BIKE COALITION: $682 · OtherSILICON VALLEY BIKE COALITIONIndividual grant recipient: $600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY KIDS INC: $508 · OtherWHALEMAN FOUNDATION: $450 · Other+4 more: $1,015 · Other+4 moreFoxcroft School: $5,404 · EducationFoxcroft SchoolWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $1,891 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGETHE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC: $1,850 · EducationTHE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INCShe Sends Foundation: $1,029 · EducationShe Sends Foundation+2 more: $358 · EducationTALBOT HUMANE CO: $3,575 · AnimalsTALBOT HUMANE …ADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $619 · EnvironmentSEA HUGGER: $587 · EnvironmentPacific Beach Coalition: $406 · EnvironmentCoastside Land Trust: $350 · EnvironmentSKULL GAMES: $1,520 · Crime & LegalLIVE IN PEACE: $258 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $135 · Philanthropy
Other$10,846Education$10,532Animals$3,575Environment$1,962Crime & Legal$1,520Youth Development$258Philanthropy$135

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoxcroft School: $5,404 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTALBOT HUMANE CO: $3,575 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $1,891 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKULL GAMES: $1,520 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JAMES ACADEMY INC: $1,516 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $619 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEA HUGGER: $587 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPacific Beach Coalition: $406 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCoastside Land Trust: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYNAPSE SCHOOL: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET SCHOLARS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Foxcroft School ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT HUMANE CO ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SKULL GAMES ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds She Sends Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds SEA HUGGER ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Beach Coalition ↗
  • Who funds Coastside Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds SYNAPSE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LIVE IN PEACE ↗
  • Who funds THE SKATEPARK PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET SCHOLARS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brandon and Ivette White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brandon and Ivette White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brandon and Ivette White’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home