Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2022
20
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$605k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Corporation Of Haverford College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’17
10
’18
9
’20
9
’21
9
’22
9
’23
10
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.6MArts & Culture$550kPublic Safety & Disaster$405kReligion$400kScience & Tech$320kHealth$245kCivil Rights$200kHuman Services$100kOther$0
02FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $300k
  • $250k+1 grant · $605k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - UNDESIGNATED$605,000
HAVERFORD COLLEGE - CHESICK SCHOLARS$50,000
BRENTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$50,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - BUSINESS SCHOOL$50,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$50,000
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES$25,000
BERRY COLLEGE$25,000
UCLA MEDICAL CENTER-PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$25,000
CASA OF LOS ANGELES$25,000
KIRBY SCHOOL$10,000
COALITION FOR ENGAGED EDUCATION (NEW VISIONS FOUNDATION)$10,000
SCHOOL ON WHEELS$10,000
THE RAPE FOUNDATIONSTUART HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%OPCC: $5k → 14%OPCC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 24 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down. Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$5.4M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+89%

Still filing today

46%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +46%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $400k · revenue +28%
  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MM
    MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • HU
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY - RESIDENCE EXPERIENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TN
    TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Wellesley College

To provide an excellent liberal arts education for women who will make a difference in the world.

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
11
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is The People Concern. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STANFORD UNIVERSITY - UNDESIGNATED: $2,490,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY - UNDESIGNATEDBRENTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $360,000 · OtherBRENTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHAVERFORD COLLEGE - CHESICK SCHOLARS: $300,000 · OtherHAVERFORD COLLEGE - CHESICK SCHOLARSUCLA MEDICAL CENTER-PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $160,000 · Other+13 more: $410,000 · Other+13 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,690,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $800,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGETHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELESBERRY COLLEGE INC: $100,000 · Education+2 more: $165,000 · Education+2 moreLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $400,000 · Arts & CultureHobart Shakespeareans: $150,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $405,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $5,000 · Civil RightsTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $35,000 · EnvironmentDIY GIRLS: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,720,000Education$2,955,000Arts & Culture$550,000Human Services$415,000Civil Rights$205,000Environment$35,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,690,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $800,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $405,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $400,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHobart Shakespeareans: $150,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCoalition for Engaged Education: $80,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIY GIRLS: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Hobart Shakespeareans ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Engaged Education ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DIY GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DR SUSAN LOVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bowen H and Janice Arthur McCoy’s filings →

More from the funding graph