Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bosk Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$623k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$539k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$898kRecreation & Sports$45kPublic Benefit$20kEducation$10kYouth Development$7kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$6kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
  • $250k+1 grant · $539k
$2,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JESUS FILM PROJECT$539,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$20,000
CENTER FOR ARIZONE POLICY$15,000
SCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH$10,975
GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK$10,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$10,000
GILBERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
CRU FOUNDATION$3,600
PIONEERS$2,250
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$2,000
MISSIONS DOOR$1,200
WOMEN'S HOPE CENTER$1,000
AVANT MINISTRIES$900
YOUNG LIFE$800
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAVING AMY: $300 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CT
CO
MO
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$974k · 14 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$974k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
-39%

Still filing today

29%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Youth DevelopmentReligionCivil RightsInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +120%
  • GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +97%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • C
    CRU
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • M
    MEDSEND
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
5
Redeemer City to City

Redeemer City to City (RCTC) exists to multiply churches and Christian leaders committed to a shared vision for gospel movements in the great cities of the world.

Religion
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
8
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Arizona Inc

To evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, to disciple them in the Word of God, and to enfold them and their families in the local church for Christian living whenever possible.

—
9
Global Mobilization Ministries Inc

To support christian ministries throughout the world

Religion
10
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
11
Gospel Family Ministries

Gospel Family Ministries exists to strengthen family ministry in the local church and to cultivate family worship in the home. Our ministry seeks to equip families with a biblical vision of family ministry, a biblical passion for family…

Religion
12
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Saving Amy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $787,008 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC+18 more: $129,495 · Other+18 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $6,630 · Youth DevelopmentGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $30,000 · ReligionPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $2,000 · ReligionGilbert Christian Schools Inc: $5,000 · EducationALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,000 · Civil RightsChildcare Worldwide: $360 · InternationalSAVING AMY INC: $300 · Human Services
Other$916,503Youth Development$51,630Religion$32,000Education$5,000Civil Rights$4,000International$360Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $6,630 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildcare Worldwide: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING AMY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Gilbert Christian Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Childcare Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds SAVING AMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL12.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bosk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bosk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bosk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph