Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bosarge Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$307k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$2.7MArts & Culture$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.0MPublic Benefit$600kPhilanthropy$480kHuman Services$232kInternational$221kCivil Rights$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC$100,000
BOOTHBAY REGION YMCA$53,500
LIFEFLIGHT OF MAINE$50,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$25,000
THE SAFE ALLIANCE$25,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES$25,000
HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER$25,000
ST THERESA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $235k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $100k → 9%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $50k → 9%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $25k → 9%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 10 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$3.3M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+5%

Still filing today

90%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    American Association for Cancer Research Inc
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +19%
  • AG
    ASTROS GOLF FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +211%
  • AC
    APOLLO CHAMBER PLAYERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CF
    CURA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $998k · revenue -96%
  • MD
    MUSIC DOING GOOD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $873k · 64% of their budget
  • TF
    TEXAS FLYING LEGENDS MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $320k · 58% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
2
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Md Anderson Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
5
Houston Geological Society Foundation
—
6
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
7
The Legacy Films Foundation
—
8
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
9
The Argosy Foundation
—
10
George Hw Bush Foundation for Us-China Relations
International
11
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
12
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Texas Flying Legends Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyClassical Music EnsemblesVeteran Support ServicesYmca Community CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr10%18%35–55yr13%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%20%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr10%2%35–55yr13%22%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/34
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,770

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/34
Grantees still filing
18/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSIC DOING GOOD INC — $872,776 · OtherMUSIC DOING GOOD INCTEXAS FLYING LEGENDS MUSEUM — $320,000 · OtherTEXAS FLYING LEGENDS MUSEUMWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $300,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENC…APOLLO CHAMBER PLAYERS — $200,000 · OtherAPOLLO CHAMBER PLAYERSGENETICS POLICY INSTITUTE — $130,000 · OtherGENETICS POLICY INSTITUTEYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $96,500 · Other+17 more — $316,469 · Other+17 moreASTROS GOLF FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyASTROS GOLF FOUNDATIONDonors Trust Inc — $354,525 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust IncTexans for Lawsuit Reform Foundation — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTexans for Lawsuit Refor…+2 more — $75,000 · PhilanthropyCURA FOUNDATION — $997,500 · Human ServicesCURA FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC — $175,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THAI DAUG…+2 more — $60,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc — $1,000,000 · HealthAmerican Associatio…Chopra Foundation — $113,000 · HealthChopra FoundationREGENERATIVE MEDICINE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $20,000 · HealthTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $600,000 · EducationTHE GEORG…+1 more — $10,000 · EducationTRUE THE VOTE INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsARS LYRICA HOUSTON — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC — $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,235,745Philanthropy$1,529,525Human Services$1,232,500Health$1,183,000Education$610,000Civil Rights$100,000Arts & Culture$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetASTROS GOLF FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCURA FOUNDATION — $997,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetMUSIC DOING GOOD INC — $872,776 over 1y, 64% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDonors Trust Inc — $354,525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS FLYING LEGENDS MUSEUM — $320,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetAPOLLO CHAMBER PLAYERS — $200,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC — $175,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetChopra Foundation — $113,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTexans for Lawsuit Reform Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 91% of budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $96,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLifeFlight of Maine LLC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHelping a HeroOrg — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $48,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $48,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARS LYRICA HOUSTON — $40,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINENATIONS GROUP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetA GLIMMER OF HOPE FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EXUMA FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTexas Heart Institute — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNED SPACE FLIGHT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOTHBAY HARBOR ONE DESIGN ASSN — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Texas Instruments Fou…The Chicago Community…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX16.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bosarge Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bosarge Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bosarge Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home