· Private foundation
Boger Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k69 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $510,000 |
| WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $425,000 |
| MUSEUM OF SCIENCE | $260,000 |
| OUR GENERATION SPEAKSBRANDEIS U | $200,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION MA | $170,000 |
| HASTINGS CENTER FOR BIOETHICS | $150,000 |
| BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION | $115,000 |
| GMHC | $100,000 |
| FORT POINT ARTS COMMUNITY INC | $100,000 |
| MASSCHALLENGE | $85,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC | $75,000 |
| BRCORG | $65,000 |
| BEYOND CELIAC | $60,000 |
| X-PRIZE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $248k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
106 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WUWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +36%
- MOMUSEUM OF SCIENCE5× · 2020–2024 · $860k · revenue +13%
BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $515k · revenue +25%
Funded once
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +31%- JSJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +24%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fort Point Arts Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds MASSCHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Justice For Our Neighbors of The Delaware Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds BEYOND CELIAC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VOTER CHOICE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FORT POINT ARTS COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · The Klarman Family Foundation · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Barr Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boger Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Museum of African American History Inc — 43% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Gateways Access to Jewish Education Inc — 7% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Masschallenge Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cornerstone Montgomery — 3% of income from government
- The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Grub Street Inc — 2% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mudflat Pottery School Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mass Insight Education and Research Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Minute Man Arc for Human Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Ballet Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Boger Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Boger Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.