Skip to content

· Private foundation

Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.4MHuman Services$1.6MArts & Culture$1.2MEducation$969kYouth Development$792kHealth$687kReligion$364kEmployment$250kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $323k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE T$150,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$145,000
GOLDEN GIRL INC$106,000
Individual grant recipient$100,500
SALVATION ARMY$96,000
CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES INC FBO CRIDL$85,000
HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART$80,000
HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
WALKING MIRACLES FAMILY FOUNDATION$75,000
GREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATIO$75,000
YMCA$68,800
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HUNTIN$67,000
HUNTINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$66,000
HERITAGE FARM MUSEUM$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $50k → 19%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $50k → 19%GOLDEN GIRLS INC: $210k → 18%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $50k → 19%GOLDEN GIRLS INC: $150k → 18%GOLDEN GIRL INC: $106k → 18%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $50k → 19%GOLDEN GIRL INC: $85k → 18%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $30k → 19%GOLDEN GIRLS INC: $50k → 18%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $25k → 19%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $30k → 19%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $30k → 19%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE: $20k → 19%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $20k → 19%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $15k → 19%GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $5k → 19%RIVER VALLEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $25k → 19%KIWANIS DAY CARE CENTER: $4k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 42 repeat orgs$579k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
16

Total granted

$8.5M
$506k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+8%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GOLDEN GIRL INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $601k · revenue +53%
  • HS
    HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $470k · revenue +14% · 36% of their budget
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Wilderness Trace Child Development Cente Corporation

The organization's mission is to provide educational and therapeutic services for children (age 0-5 years) with and without disabilities.

—
3
Child Development Center of Central Wv Inc

Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12

Education
4
Hunger Mountain Child Center Inc

Child care and preschool provider

Human Services
5
The Child Care and Learning Center

The establishment and operation of a child learning/daycare facility for the use, benefit, and general welfare of the children of rappahannock county, virginia.

Education
6
Our Jobs Our Children Our Future Inc

Bringing industry and new businesses to the tri-state area, particularly huntington, west virginia.

Community Improvement
7
Central Child Care of Wv

Supervision of child care providers

Human Services
8
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
9
Housing Development Corporation

Promote and advance decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income, the elderly, disadvantaged or infirm, in the cabell- wayne counties and surrounding metropolitan area of west virginia.

Housing & Shelter
10
Reachh Family Resource Center Inc

Providing access to a comprehensive and coordinated array of needed services, including outreach crisis, intervention, advocacy, parent education, daycare, informational referrals and linkages, and childrens' recreation and educational…

Human Services
11
Harrison Children's Center Inc

To provide daycare and child development services to children

Human Services
12
Bucksport Area Child Care Center

It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the River Cities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Autism Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $748,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $475,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $336,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $330,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATIO: $325,000 · OtherGREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATIOWALKING MIRACLES FAMILY FOUNDATION: $305,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE T: $250,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC: $222,000 · OtherYMCA FOUNDATION OF HUNTINGTON INC: $216,000 · OtherHERITAGE FARM MUSEUM: $195,000 · OtherFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $195,000 · Other+35 more: $2,124,187 · Other+35 moreHUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $470,000 · Arts & CultureHUNTINGTON SY…HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $315,000 · Arts & CultureHUNTINGTON MU…KEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $145,000 · Arts & CultureKEITH ALBEE P…Huntington Children's Museum Inc: $111,000 · Arts & CultureHuntington Ch…GOLDEN GIRL INC: $601,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN GIRL …CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $245,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S P…GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesGREEN ACRES …+2 more: $28,500 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC: $225,000 · HealthLILY'S PLACE INC: $220,000 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · HealthMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $285,000 · EducationMOUNTWEST FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationCABELL COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50,000 · EducationDRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC: $250,000 · EmploymentJOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC: $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentHUNTINGTON LITTLE LEAGUE 3: $27,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,721,687Arts & Culture$1,041,000Human Services$1,004,500Health$465,000Education$435,000Employment$250,000Youth Development$130,000Recreation & Sports$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOLDEN GIRL INC: $601,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetHUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $470,000 over 6y, 36% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $315,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $285,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC: $250,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetCHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $245,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC: $225,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC: $222,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLILY'S PLACE INC: $220,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $195,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc: $180,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetKEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $145,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetJOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC: $130,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetGREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetHuntington Children's Museum Inc: $111,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMOUNTWEST FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetRIVER VALLEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROACT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE RIVER CITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOLDEN GIRL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds LILY'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc ↗
  • Who funds KEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Huntington Children's Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the Tri-State Community IncKY28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · The Huntington Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · United Way of the River Cities Inc · Brown Dog Yoga Foundation · Stella Fuller Settlement Inc · Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust · Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo?

    Find your warmest path to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph