· Public charity
Amy Wellness Foundation
To improve the health and well-being of the people in western north carolina, with particular emphasis on those living in avery, mitchell, and yancey counties.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $365k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $918k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AVERY YMCA | $500,000 |
| MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH | $300,000 |
| HIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH | $250,000 |
| TRACTOR FOOD & FARMS | $150,000 |
| W A M Y COMMUNITY ACTION INC | $130,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE | $100,000 |
| SOUTHERN RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES | $80,625 |
| FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES | $72,600 |
| DIG IN YANCEY COMMUNITY GARDEN | $70,000 |
| PARTNERS ALIGNED TOWARD HEALTH | $60,000 |
| MITCHELL SHEPHERDS STAFF | $55,000 |
| AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| HANDS OF HOPE | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $508k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $620k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WYWILLIAMS YMCA OF AVERY COUNTY5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +91%
- WCWAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $747k · revenue +57%
- TRToe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc3× · 2020–2024 · $369k · revenue +103% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- MCMITCHELL COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTone grant, 2021 · $84k
- CCCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +36%
- MCMITCHELL COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2020 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services for elderly
A collaborative network that increases access and improves health outcomes for safety net populations in western north carolina
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
To create high quality employment opportunities for unemployed and underemployed residents of mitchell, avery, and yancey counties in north carolina
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community
Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless
The hunger and health coalition relieves poverty and hunger for households experiencing economic hardship and food insecurity. we serve low-income and uninsured residents of avery, watauga and ashe counties who are forced to choose between…
To provide affordable housing for low-income individuals living in buncombe county and the surrounding areas of north carolina.
Guided by faith, love, and respect, we provide food, shelter, and individualized supportive services for Haywood County residents.
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
Provided mediation services and information to clients in six counties of western north carolina to resolve conflicts through mediation between individuals or organizations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Country Community Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anc Blue Ridge Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLIAMS YMCA OF AVERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Toe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Reconciliation Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ANC BLUE RIDGE HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Dig In Yancey Community Garden ↗
- Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Partners Aligned Toward Health ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL GIVING GARDENS ↗
- Who funds CAREREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CAREGIVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BULADEAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERDS STAFF ↗
- Who funds AVERY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds Hands of Hope North Carolina ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS FEEDING NEIGHBORS FOOD MI ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP SPRING CREEK INC ↗
- Who funds REACHING AVERY MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds SPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Yancey County Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE BLUE RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds Mayland Community College Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Manna Food Bank Inc · Samuel L Phillips Family Foundation · Mountain Air Community Fund Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · The High Country Charitable Foundation · Arthur Family Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Grandfather Community Foundation Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amy Wellness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Amy Wellness Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Amy Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.